Search for: "Foster v. Cohen" Results 61 - 80 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
Index on Censorship reports that while you can read Nick Cohen’s latest book, ‘You Can’t Read This Book’, you may not be able to read his tweets, following unexplained suspensions of his account. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We don’t have to vote for the old guys v. the new guys. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Q: does AARON/Cohen register copyrights? [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:21 am
Wilner served as counsel of record to Guantanamo detainees in Rasul v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 8:53 am by Sarah Grant
District Court for the Eastern District of New York dismissed Force and a companion case, Cohen v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm by fjhinojosa
Beyer was recently mentioned in Hunter, Jr. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:16 pm by Meg
Unique materials, BD materials, open access, Cohen fellowship – but we can’t do it allJG: tension between individual and institutional voicesQ for JP: hurdles that need to be overcome? [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
The joint note verbale also cites the 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
., Mary Ann Glendon—an interesting debate on the right over what IP is and whether it’s a right; Julie Cohen: rights talk in privacy v. [read post]
4 Mar 2017, 4:34 pm by Chuck Cosson
 Privacy serves to protect personal autonomy, and as an end in and of itself that fosters self-development.[4] As Daniel Solove noted, one of the key purposes of privacy is to allow individuals to exercise a degree of control over what we share, to develop “places of solitude…where we are free of the gaze of others,” and to manage boundaries that are essential for identity, self-esteem, and a personal sense that one is worthy of respect.[5] Publication of private… [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:37 pm by Adam Thierer
Most notably, Nichols claims that “postal subsidies… helped to foster the abolitionist press,” and claims that this proves that “we can have a dissident, challenging—anti-government press, operating within a system of subsidies. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]