Search for: "Francis Davey"
Results 41 - 59
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2011, 6:35 pm
I look forward to it.oh and Ps as for Newzbin (no 2), read Francis Davey's great summary here . [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Davey appeared on the Court’s docket, he noted: “It may be that the most important future litigation will concern . . . attacks on state constitutional prohibitions of aid on the ground that they constitute a denial of the ‘equal protection of the law’ protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:33 am
In answer to my own not so jocular question in the title, the answer is, I truely don't know..So the long awaited decision in Newzbin 2 aka Twentieth Century Fox et al v BT [2011] EWHC 1981 (Ch) is out. [read post]
5 May 2022, 6:20 am
. - FSC, Article 21.5 II (Panel) 108 European Communities Sep 30, 2005 Mar 14, 2006 Agriculture, DSU, GATT, SCM Denis, Chambovey, Seung Wha Chang EC - Trademarks / GIs (Panel)(Australia) 290 Australia Mar 15, 2005 Apr 20, 2005 GATT, TBT, TRIPS Mendoza, Seung Wha Chang, Cheung EC - Trademarks / GIs (Panel)(U.S.) 174 United States Mar 15, 2005 Apr 20, 2005 GATT, TRIPS Mendoza, Seung Wha Chang, Cheung Canada - Aircraft II (Panel) 222 Brazil Jan 28, 2002 Feb 19, 2002 SCM Davey, Seung Wha Chang,… [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 9:29 pm
[I should point out that in all of this, I agree with Francis Davey's comments on my 'Malcolm in brief' post. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 12:01 am
I do know a lot of stuff, I represent people in court many times in a month and usually win my cases, I train others in housing law, but I admit I don’t have the subtle level of legal knowledge of people like Tessa, Giles Peaker or Francis Davey. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 9:29 pm
[I should point out that in all of this, I agree with Francis Davey's comments on my 'Malcolm in brief' post. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 12:02 am
A big heads up and a happy Christmas to Giles Peaker, David Smith, Francis Davey and the assorted lads and lasses at Nearly Legal. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 5:16 pm
There has been some noisy discussion around “trolls” (news reports wrongly conflated entirely different legal cases with the provisions of the Defamation Bill; as set out by Francis Davey here; Padraig Reidy here). [read post]
5 May 2022, 6:20 am
. - FSC, Article 21.5 II (Panel) 108 European Communities Sep 30, 2005 Mar 14, 2006 Agriculture, DSU, GATT, SCM Denis, Chambovey, Seung Wha Chang EC - Trademarks / GIs (Panel)(Australia) 290 Australia Mar 15, 2005 Apr 20, 2005 GATT, TBT, TRIPS Mendoza, Seung Wha Chang, Cheung EC - Trademarks / GIs (Panel)(U.S.) 174 United States Mar 15, 2005 Apr 20, 2005 GATT, TRIPS Mendoza, Seung Wha Chang, Cheung Canada - Aircraft II (Panel) 222 Brazil Jan 28, 2002 Feb 19, 2002 SCM Davey, Seung Wha Chang,… [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:32 am
And people who I have exchanged ideas/crossed swords with in 2011, who include Sharon Crosland, JS, Nearly Legal, Francis Davey, David Smith, William Flack, David Reaney, Ron Heywood, Mary Latham. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 9:19 am
An attorney representing special prosecutor Francis Schmitz warned the media and public against jumping to conclusions of guilt based on documents within a once-secret John Doe probe that emerged in a federal lawsuit. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Media organisations reported this aspect in the context of other legal activity around internet “trolls“, in rather a muddled fashion – as Francis Davey points out here, and Padraig Reidy noted here. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 5:34 am
you ask.As Francis Davey has cogently pointed out, the threat that an ISP will be stuck with all the costs of the court action (see 97B(4) above in bold) will effectively nullify almost any ISP putting up resistance, when notified to block a site. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:58 am
UK LAWYERS Blog of blogs By supporting each other we raise the profile of us all Edition No.1 This is the first edition of the UK Lawyers Blog of Blogs and has nothing to do with the esteemed Blawg Review from across the pond. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm
Professor Richard Leiter, on his blog, The Life of Books, poses The 21st Century Law Library Conundrum: Free Law and Paying to Understand It: The digital revolution, that once upon a time promised free access to legal materials, will deliver on that promise; it’s just that the free materials it will deliver, even if it comprises the sum total of all primary law in the country at every level and jurisdiction, will amount to only a minor portion of the materials that lawyers need in order to… [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
Pinnock v Manchester City Council [2010] UKSC 45 (Supreme Court pdf & BAILII links) Whenever a battle weary group of housing lawyers gets together, conversation inevitably turns (after the routine complaints about the less congenial DJs) to the thorny issue of which is the most important housing law case of all. [read post]
