Search for: "Frank Pasquale"
Results 241 - 260
of 448
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2011, 6:04 pm
Rivera and his $817,067 consultant Stewart Baker, Words you can’t say at the Pentagon Frank Pasquale, All the Right Moves [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 7:53 pm
Search neutrality: Frank Pasquale hasn’t put it to Tim in this symposium, so I will! [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 10:38 am
Our own Frank Pasquale 3. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:58 pm
” (Check out the other essays on this topic by Frank Pasquale, Eric Goldman and James Grimmelmann, linked to here, under Chapter 7). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:20 pm
--Frank Pasquale] On first read, the most striking aspect of Judge Vinson’s ruling today is not its remedy — striking the Affordable Care Act in its entirety — but the impression one gets that the opinion was written in part as a Tea Party Manifesto. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 12:30 pm
We also have a spectacular set of law professors and legal commentators, including Concurring Opinions’ own Frank Pasquale, New York Law School’s Molly Beutz Land, Lea Shaver at Hofstra Law School, and Susan Sell of the Elliot School of International Affairs at GW. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 10:06 am
Frank Pasquale, Seton Hall Law School Panel 3: Who Will Govern the Net in 2020? [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 11:20 am
Frank Pasquale, Seton Hall Law School Me: two noteworthy dynamics (1) different types of Internet exceptionalism are proliferating, and (2) 230 liability umbrella allows for UGC experimentation like we’ve never seen before. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 5:49 am
Frank Pasquale, Seton Hall Law School, @BlckBx 3:25 – 3:40pm Coffee break 3:40 – 4:50pm Panel 3: Who Will Govern the Net in 2020? [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:50 am
Frank Pasquale, Seton Hall Law School Panel 3: Who Will Govern the Net in 2020? [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:29 am
It begins like this:Marc Spindelman’s essay Sexuality’s Law, forthcoming in the Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, is one of the most extraordinary pieces of legal writing on the interrelations of law, culture and sexuality to appear in a law journal in well over a decade, perhaps much longer.It ends with:This is writing that matters, that serves truth, that responds to injury, and that restores one’s faith in the legal academy; this is what legal scholarship can be.And the… [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
Frank Pasquale A banana usually sells for about 30 cents. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 11:18 am
Frank Pasquale, Dan Solove, and I have chapters in the book as do Saul Levmore, Martha Nussbaum, Cass Sunstein, Anupam Chander, Karen Bradshaw and Souvik Saha, Brian Leiter, Geoffrey Stone, John Deigh, Lior Strahilevitz, and Ruben Rodrigues. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 1:12 pm
Peñalver), Deborah Hellman’s Money Talks But It Isn’t Speech, Orly Lobel’s The Incentives Matrix: The Comparative Effectiveness of Rewards, Liabilities, Duties and Protections for Reporting Illegality, Michael Madison, Brett Frischmann and Katharine Strandburg’s Constructing Commons in the Cultural Environment, Jon Michaels’s Privatization’s Pretensions, Helen Norton’s The Supreme Court’s Post-Racial Turn Towards a Zero-Sum Understanding of… [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 10:54 am
In Search, Speech, and Secrecy: Corporate Strategies for Inverting Net Neutrality Debates, Frank Pasquale cautions against broad deference to corporate entities that may disguise their efforts to control data flows online. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:15 pm
Thus, like diplomats who are free to travel between international outposts with the protection of la valise diplomatique--or the diplomatic pouch--packets of information that travel on the internet should, in this frame, receive similar protection.In Search, Speech, and Secrecy: Corporate Strategies for Inverting Net Neutrality Debates, Frank Pasquale cautions against broad deference to corporate entities that may disguise their efforts to control data flows online. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 11:27 am
(Not surprisingly, Frank Pasquale seems reflexively to approve): My research, shows that people’s circumstances affect whether they are likely to act prosocially. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:22 am
Frank Pasquale starts his commentary on Judge Hudson's Obamacare decision with this observation: I guess we all now know that Federal Judge Henry E. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am
” At Concurring Opinions, Frank Pasquale expresses concern that, “[i]f the Supreme Court affirms [Sebelius], we are well on our way to a new Lochner era. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:44 pm
Commentary on today’s Obamacare decision: Frank Pasquale, Concurring Opinions: “If the Supreme Court affirms it, we are well on our way to a new Lochner era. [read post]
