Search for: "Frank Pasquale"
Results 321 - 340
of 448
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2008, 6:06 pm
Last Frank Pasquale's Copyright in an Era of Information Overload: Toward the Privileging of Categorizers, 60 VAND. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
At Balkanization, Frank Pasquale discusses recent scholarship analyzing the Court’s decisions in Sorrell v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:56 am
(In this post, Frank Pasquale has collected links to more optimistic commentary, and offers some encouraging comments of his own.) [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 3:42 am
Bartow's tag prompted Frank Pasquale to link to his five favorite non-legal blogs. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 3:56 pm
Right now I'm preparing to leave town again for a conference, but will blog shortly on a series of great posts by Frank Pasquale on Concurring Opinions. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 3:17 am
I give you from Frank Pasquale's post at Concurring Opinions today -- Inspiration and Realism in Denver -- the pessimistic part from Patricia J. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 10:54 am
In Search, Speech, and Secrecy: Corporate Strategies for Inverting Net Neutrality Debates, Frank Pasquale cautions against broad deference to corporate entities that may disguise their efforts to control data flows online. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:44 pm
Commentary on today’s Obamacare decision: Frank Pasquale, Concurring Opinions: “If the Supreme Court affirms it, we are well on our way to a new Lochner era. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
” Introduced by Congressman Bob Goodlatte (bio) Frank Pasquale, Associate Professor of Law at Seton Hall Law School (bio) Lauren Gelman, Executive Director and Lecturer of Law at Stanford Law (bio) “Can ISP Immunity Survive the Onslaught of Web 2.0″ General welcoming from Congressman Mike Honda (bio) Introduced by Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren (bio) Mike Fertik, CEO of Reputation Defender (bio) Dan Dougherty, eBay(bio) “The Movement of… [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 5:54 am
by Frank Pasquale at Concurring Opinions. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:05 am
Frank Pasquale of Balkinization explains that “while IMS v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 10:13 am
If you would rather hear, than read, me drone on about the Facebook and OkCupid experiments (and some other recent digital research, including Apple's ResearchKit and the University of Michigan's Facebook app-based GWAS, "Genes for Good," as well as learning healthcare systems and the future of human subjects research) you may do so by listening to episode 9 of Nic Terry's and Frank Pasquale terrific new weekly podcast, This Week in Health Law. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:05 pm
Speaking of health, law professor (and iPhone enthusiast) Nick Terry asked me to announce that he and Professor Frank Pasquale started a new podcast called This Week in Health Law. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 6:21 pm
(Check out some other lists of 5 in this meme from Frank Pasquale, Mike Madison, and Ann Bartow.) [read post]
24 Mar 2013, 10:14 am
We're waiting for the European denouement, but in the interim, some of the more interesting links I've seen about the FTC settlement: * Frank Pasquale and Siva Vaidhyanathan, Borking Antitrust: Google Secures Its Monopoly * James Grimmelmann: Not with a Bang and Devils and Details [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 8:33 am
Frank Pasquale of Seton Hall law, discusses a few of the chapters specifically, but not mine — so I’m more bragging on my co-authors!) [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:54 am
A growing cabal of cyberlaw experts—Tim Wu, Dawn Nunziato, Frank Pasquale, among many others—argue that some sort of regulation is needed. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 10:19 am
Frank Pasquale and I have written about it in our forthcoming article in Hastings Law Journal–Frank’s important book Black Box Society will extend those concerns to secret rankings by corporations that have a profound impact on our lives. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:59 am
Frank Pasquale Compare: Tim Wu using the electric grid as model—anyone can plug in, you don’t have to give the grid a cut. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
Along these lines, Frank Pasquale is right to note that conservatives will see our discussion of the ascendancy of the elite conservative legal network as “a balm, not a curse,” while liberals will bemoan this effort “to remake our judiciary. [read post]
