Search for: "Frank Pasquale" Results 121 - 140 of 457
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2018, 8:51 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
I recently joined Nicolas Terry and Frank Pasquale for the 139th episode of their podcast series, THIS WEEK IN HEALTH LAW. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 5:30 am by JB
Irvine), Sandy Levinson (Texas), Frank Pasquale (Maryland), Rick Pildes (NYU), John McGinnis (Northwestern), and myself.At the conclusion, Neal and Larry will respond to the commentators. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 9:24 am by Stefan J. Padfield
Article is major challenge 2 traditional econ & #corpgov; needs attention from competition authorities ^ @HarvLRev https://t.co/fD9edh22vp— Frank Pasquale (@FrankPasquale) April 4, 2016 "In fact, corporate governance arrangements are not contractual. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:06 pm
In a recent post, Frank Pasquale notes that there is little variation in the kinds of hyperlinks one can create on the internet. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:19 pm by andré douglas pond cummings
Many thanks to Solangel Maldonado, Frank Pasquale, Kaimi Wenger and the Concurring Opinions crew for the invitation to guest blog in this space. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:18 am by Kim Krawiec
, these posts at the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, this round-up of initial takes by Frank Pasquale, this short summary and reaction from Steven Davidoff at the Deal Professor, and the exchange between Becker and Posner. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 11:50 am
Via Frank Pasquale, Seton Hall Law is hosting a symposium on pandemic flu this fall. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 1:34 pm by Alan S. Kaplinsky
Frank Pasquale, Professor of Law, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law. [read post]
1 May 2007, 5:20 pm
On the practice of selective quotation in the US, see this NYT story (also via Frank). [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 3:30 am by Mary Crossley
Gordon Hull & Frank Pasquale, Toward a Critical Theory of Corporate Wellness, BioSocieties (2017). [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:40 pm by Bernard E. Harcourt
Following up on my post on the S& P downgrade, some interesting comments about defense spending, and Frank Pasquale’s powerful remarks on austerity, Lori Williams over at Tableau Software produced two marvelous graphs that visualize my earlier thoughts on deficits and defense spending. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 2:26 am
As the politics of the bailout get more and more heated, my friend and colleague Frank Pasquale, a regular at this blogging stuff who has also been thinking about the proposed bailout, was kind enough to comment on one of my earlier posts. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:59 am
Thanks so much to Dan Solove, Frank Pasquale, and the rest of the distinguished group for allowing me to sully the Concurring Opinions cyberspace. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 6:05 pm
Frank Pasquale with a great post showing how the "elite consensus" that we can't afford Medicare and Medicaid should not be taken at face value. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 12:50 pm
  First, Frank Pasquale blogs here about what type of privacy regulation is appropriate for Google and responds to an editorial in the Economist comparing Google to financial institutions, given that both serve as repositories of information about people. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 12:27 pm
Frank Pasquale's post yesterday, Neoliberal Penality in Action, seems particularly timely in light of today's newly-released report by The Sentencing Project, No Exit: The Expanding Use of Life Sentences in America. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 2:23 pm
  Along these lines, Frank Pasquale at concurringopinions has a post about greed. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 6:54 am
Concurring Opinions co-proprietor Frank Pasquale has an interesting reflection on a recent critique of the explosion of law review articles and the possibly autopoietic self-referentiality of citations (it seems to me it is a fair interpretation of the largely irrefutable evidence Paul Caron has gathered on the "long-tail" of legal scholarship.) [read post]
13 Nov 2016, 4:44 pm by Howard Wasserman
Blaming women for not coming around or blaming Clinton for not being sufficiently appealing to women is both empirically inaccurate (she won with women overall and with every category except non-college-educated white women) and reflects the misogyny that marred the election. 2) This, from Frank Pasquale at CoOp. [read post]