Search for: "Frank v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 2,021
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2021, 8:54 am by Mark MacCarthy
The Safe Tech Act responds, among other things, to the Herrick v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm by Victoria Gallegos
United States on the Biden administration’s immigration agenda. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
Frank Bowman recently published an essay in Lawfare that criticized arguments I made in an essay on the site. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 2:45 am by Jon L. Gelman
”    The organizations joining ADAO in these legal actions are the American Public Health Association (APHA); Center for Environmental Health (CEH); Environmental Information Association (EIA): Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families (SCHF); and Vermont Public Interest Research Group (VPIRG) Scientists participating are Barry Castleman, ScD; Raja Flores, MD; Arthur Frank, MD, PhD; Philip Landrigan, MD, MSc; Richard Lemen, PhD, MSPH; and Celeste Monforton, DrPH, MPH.To… [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm by Katherine McKeen
In the 1980s, faith groups in the Southwestern United States organized to aid refugees fleeing from violence in Central America. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm by INFORRM
United States Mike Lindell, commonly known as “Mr Pillow Guy” has sued the Daily Mail in the Southern District of New York over an article romantically linking him to the actor Jane Krakowski. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  In the United States at the end of the millennium, even liberals with gay friends viewed the social group through the lens of sexuality. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
United States The Supreme Court of the State of New York’s Second Department has overturned a decades-old precedent when it ruled that a false claim of homosexuality is no longer defamation per se. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
Federal law prohibits “depredation against any property of the United States” as well as robbing or attempting to rob “another of any kind or description of personal property belonging to the United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]