Search for: "Frank v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 2,147
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2023, 8:09 am by Lawrence Solum
Here is an example from Judge Frank Easterbrook's opinion in United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
Mangino, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Wednesday, February 8, 2023 Tags: Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, Delaware cases, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware law, Fiduciary duties, LP v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
Mangino, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Wednesday, February 8, 2023 Tags: Boardwalk Pipeline Partners, Delaware cases, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware law, Fiduciary duties, LP v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
  To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:49 am by Rebecca Hamilton
Indeed, Facebook allocates 87 percent of its misinformation budget to the United States and Canada alone. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
All courts in the United States are bound by vertical precedent to follow the holdings of decisions by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am by Frank Cranmer
The bishops are united in condemning homophobia and urged churches to welcome same-sex couples ‘unreservedly and joyfully’. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
” From the States and Municipalities Arizona – Voter Fraud Unit in Arizona Will [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Unknown
” But the whistleblower’s cert petition argues that Sarbanes-Oxley shifts the burden to the employer to prove a lack of retaliatory intent as an affirmative defense (Murray v. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm by admin
In state courts, gatekeeping is a very uneven process. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 1:47 am by Steve Lubet
That duty included representing those accused of conspiring to overthrow the government, as in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 4:27 am by Peter J. Sluka
Less than a week after Hodak filed his dissolution petition, Golan Floors, Ruham, and Hodak were all sued in New York County by Farhadi, a dissatisfied customer who alleged that Golan Floors damaged his furniture and performed seriously substandard work in connection with the restoration of his Chelsea condominium unit (Farhadi v Golan Floors Inc., et al., No. 655203/2019). [read post]