Search for: "Frank v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 2,122
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2015, 6:30 am by Francisco Macías
So begins the Conclusion of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, Central Division in the case of Méndez v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:46 am by Leland E. Beck
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia last week struck down the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)’s Position Limits for Futures and Swaps final rule and interim final rule in International Swaps and Derivatives Association v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 2:45 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-1099 Issues: (1) Whether the “anti-spoofing” provision of the Dodd-Frank Act, 7 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:44 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:11-cv-02075). [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:13 am by Jennifer Farer
On March 4, 2014, in a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court decided its first case under Sarbanes-Oxley’s whistleblower protection provision, Section 806. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 7:32 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Thousands of Whistleblowers At-Risk of Losing Protection WASHINGTON, DC – DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES, November 28, 2017 — The United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument today in a major precedent setting whistleblower case, Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 5:24 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, Respondent, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit admonished the Securities and Exchange Commission that the federal regulator's imposition of a collateral bar for pre-Dodd Frank misconduct was an impermissible retroactive sanction. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
§ 78u-6(h)(1)(a), apply to an employee who is terminated by a non-U.S. corporation that does business in (and is regulated by) the United States. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 12:10 pm
The plaintiff filed suit in the United States District Court for for retaliatory and discriminatory discharge in violation of Title VII and Maryland law. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by David Wagner
This post is based on input and analysis from Reed Smith attorneys across the United States. [read post]
7 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  After all, in 1841 we get the first of the Supreme Court’s slavery point-counter points in United States v. [read post]