Search for: "Frank v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 6:23 am
Energy United States, L.L.C., 720 F.3d 620 (5th Cir. 2013) Daniel Berman v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 1:10 pm
Instead, the Second Circuit held that Dodd-Frank does not apply extraterritorially, and because the plaintiff failed to allege that any of the events took place within the United States, Dodd-Frank did not apply. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:39 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
So begins the Conclusion of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, Central Division in the case of Méndez v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 12:14 pm
United States) on for background noise. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:46 am
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia last week struck down the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)’s Position Limits for Futures and Swaps final rule and interim final rule in International Swaps and Derivatives Association v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 2:45 pm
United States 17-1099 Issues: (1) Whether the “anti-spoofing” provision of the Dodd-Frank Act, 7 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:34 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:44 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:11-cv-02075). [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:13 am
On March 4, 2014, in a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court decided its first case under Sarbanes-Oxley’s whistleblower protection provision, Section 806. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:20 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 7:32 am
Thousands of Whistleblowers At-Risk of Losing Protection WASHINGTON, DC – DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNITED STATES, November 28, 2017 — The United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument today in a major precedent setting whistleblower case, Digital Realty Trust v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 11:47 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 10:45 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
§ 78u-6(h)(1)(a), apply to an employee who is terminated by a non-U.S. corporation that does business in (and is regulated by) the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 5:24 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, Respondent, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit admonished the Securities and Exchange Commission that the federal regulator's imposition of a collateral bar for pre-Dodd Frank misconduct was an impermissible retroactive sanction. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:20 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:22 am
Washington and United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:13 am
United States v. [read post]
