Search for: "Franklin v. Franklin" Results 21 - 40 of 2,529
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2024, 3:20 pm by Patricia Salkin
Compass Homes, Inc v City of Upper Arlington Board of Zoning and Planning, 2023 WL 5091859 (OH App. 8/8/2023) [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm by Marty Lederman
 The holdings of the principal cases Trump cites for the "clear statement" rule, especially Franklin v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm by Josh Blackman
I can see Justice Kavanaugh writing a concurrence explaining that the clear statement rule should apply across the board, relying on Franklin v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:45 pm
In a similar vein, from Justice Alito:So what about President Franklin D. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Samuel Alito asks about President Franklin D. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:35 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” In Seibel v Ramsay (___ AD3d ___, 2024 NY Slip Op 01617 [1st Dept Mar. 21, 2024]), the Court considered the propriety of a $4 million post-trial attorneys’ fee award to celebrity chef Gordon Ramsay under a contractual indemnification provision. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The basic bargain that President Franklin Roosevelt and Congress laid out 90 years ago was that investors get to decide which risks to take so long as those companies raising money from the public make what Roosevelt called, “complete and truthful disclosure. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 5:50 am by Harold Hongju Koh
(Editor’s Note: This post – which shares thoughts with a keynote address published in 84 Ohio State L.J. 1125 (2024) – updates remarks delivered in Lviv, Ukraine, on Dec. 10, 2023, the 75th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as the closing address at the American Society of International Law/Ukrainian Association of International Law Conference on Standing Tall for the Rule of Law in Ukraine.) [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 2:01 pm by Ilya Somin
Is it possible to give meaning to the Act's "smallest area compatible" requirement without upsetting stare decisis (that is, by overturning Franklin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:10 am by Josh Richman
Ron Wyden and former Congressman Chris Cox in Gonzalez v. [read post]