Search for: "Franks v. Delaware"
Results 461 - 480
of 592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2008, 7:43 pm
Strine notes that Unocal’s board met for eight or nine hours to consider Pickens’ offer — a response to Smith v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:15 am
" In this order, the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia found that - in AFLAC v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:33 pm
Amsterdam (1974) - 1,13382 Yale L.J. 920: The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 6:12 am
Nuccio and Richard Loewy, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 Tags: Banks, Capital requirements, Dodd-Frank Act, Financial institutions, Financial reform, Financial regulation, Liquidity, Systemic risk, Volcker Rule Stock Buyouts and Corporate Cashouts Posted by Robert J. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:04 am
Lobrano, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Saturday, January 28, 2017 Tags: Bankruptcy, Bondholders, Debt, Debtor-creditor law, Distressed companies, Foreclosures, Restructurings, Securities regulation, Trust Indenture Act, U.S. federal courts The Spotlight on Boards 2017 Posted by Martin Lipton and Sabastian V. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:53 pm
In Business Roundtable v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 4:27 am
Delaware Legislature Tables Measure to Address Fee-Shifting ByLaws: The Delaware Supreme Court stirred up quite a bit of controversy earlier this year in the ATP Tours, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:42 am
Katz, and Sabastian V. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 6:30 am
Jung (New York University), and Min Park (The Ohio State University), on Tuesday, January 16, 2018 Tags: Acquisitions, Capital allocation, Disclosure, Financial reporting, Innovation, Private equity, R&D, Venture capital firms 2017 Year in Review: Securities Litigation and Regulation Posted by Jason Halper, Kyle DeYoung and Adam Magid, Cadwalader, Wickersham and Taft LLP, on Tuesday, January 16, 2018 Tags: CHOICE Act, Class… [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 6:03 am
Mirvis, William Savitt, and Sabastian V. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 7:18 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
In FDIC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 9:57 am
The defendant moved to suppress pursuant to Franks v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 6:07 am
(As I have explained in earlier posts, in Franks v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:29 am
Cary, Federalism and Corporate Law: Reflection Upon Delaware, 83 Yale L.J. 663 (1974). [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:12 am
The answer to Question #5 is “No” as established in the Pachter v Winiarsky case Frank McRoberts and I blogged about here, here, and here. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:55 am
”) (citing Franks v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 3:45 am
There is no particular SEC rule on this issue, but it is instead based on the holding in cases like FTC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 3:50 am
The Supreme Court changed that in Franks v. [read post]
