Search for: "Franks v. Delaware" Results 481 - 500 of 598
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2008, 6:29 am
Cary, Federalism and Corporate Law: Reflection Upon Delaware, 83 Yale L.J. 663 (1974). [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:12 am by Peter Mahler
The answer to Question #5 is “No” as established in the Pachter v Winiarsky case Frank McRoberts and I blogged about here, here, and here. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 3:45 am by Broc Romanek
There is no particular SEC rule on this issue, but it is instead based on the holding in cases like FTC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 3:50 am
  The Supreme   Court changed that in Franks v. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 5:13 pm by Jimmy Verner
Frank D., 858 N.Y.S.2d 864 (Queens County Family Court 2008). [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:34 am by Broc Romanek
” Public companies also face additional rules, notably those imposed by the Sarbanes-­Oxley of 2012 and the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Moreover, Delaware Supreme Court Chief Justice Leo Strine has published a paper that also urges super majority voting by shareholders. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 6:08 am
Posted by Musa Subasi (University of Maryland, College Park), on Sunday, April 1, 2018 Tags: Board communication, Boards of Directors, Decision making, Executive performance, Firm performance, Information environment, Management, Signaling, Social networks, Stock performance Disclosing Corporate Lobbying Posted by Timothy Smith, Walden Asset Management, and John Keenan, AFSCME, on Monday, April 2, 2018 … [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:16 am by Adam Levitin
The class action suits argue that under the 2d Circuit's Madden v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am by Russell Beck
Delaware: Scott Holt, on the Delaware Non-Compete Blog (Settlement Discussions Not An Excuse for Delayed TRO Application To Enforce Noncompete), discusses a recent Delaware Chancery Court case highlighting the need to move quickly to seek a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 3:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
Braden, decided today by the Tennessee Court of Appeals, in an opinion by Judge Frank G. [read post]