Search for: "Franks v. Delaware" Results 61 - 80 of 518
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2021, 6:56 pm by Francis Pileggi
This post was prepared by Frank Reynolds, who has been following Delaware corporate law, and writing about it for various legal publications, for over 30 years. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 4:17 am by Peter Mahler
In Weingarten v Kopelowitz, 2020 NY Slip Op 51260(U) [Sup Ct Kings County 2020], the plaintiff brought suit individually and derivatively on behalf of a Delaware LLC in which he held a one-third membership agreement after he was terminated as property manager of multi-unit rental properties in Tennessee owned indirectly by the LLC. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 2:42 pm by Francis Pileggi
This post was prepared by Frank Reynolds, who has been following Delaware corporate law, and writing about it for various legal publications, for over 30 years. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm by Phil Dixon
Error to deny evidentiary hearing on IAC claim for failure to investigate and present mitigating evidence of brain damage; district court properly denied alleged Brady and Batson violations U.S. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 3:24 pm by Francis Pileggi
This post was prepared by Frank Reynolds, who has been following Delaware corporate law, and writing about it for various legal publications, for over 30 years. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
Frank Bowman recently published an essay in Lawfare that criticized arguments I made in an essay on the site. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 12:50 pm by Francis Pileggi
This post was prepared by Frank Reynolds, who has been following Delaware corporate law, and writing about it for various legal publications, for over 30 years. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 6:24 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Delaware, 438 U.S. 154, 155 (1978), or to make material omissions “that are designed to mislead, or that are made in reckless disregard of whether they would mislead, the magistrate,” United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am by Phil Dixon
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 6:53 pm by Francis Pileggi
This post was prepared by Frank Reynolds, who has been following Delaware corporate law, and writing about it for various legal publications, for over 30 years. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 12:03 pm by Francis Pileggi
This post was prepared by Frank Reynolds, who has been following Delaware corporate law, and writing about it for various legal publications, for over 30 years. [read post]