Search for: "Franks v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 4,638
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2023, 1:32 am by Frank Cranmer
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "Is there a right to same-sex marriage under the ECHR? [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
All courts in the United States are bound by vertical precedent to follow the holdings of decisions by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 4:40 am by Frank Cranmer
Masterpiece Cakeshop again In Scardina v Masterpiece Cakeshop Inc (CO Ct App. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
The threats are everywhere: Congress, state legislatures, the Supreme Court, internationally. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Unknown
” But the whistleblower’s cert petition argues that Sarbanes-Oxley shifts the burden to the employer to prove a lack of retaliatory intent as an affirmative defense (Murray v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 2:41 am by Frank Cranmer
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "Is discernment for ordination training an offer of employment? [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm by admin
In state courts, gatekeeping is a very uneven process. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 1:47 am by Steve Lubet
That duty included representing those accused of conspiring to overthrow the government, as in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 4:27 am by Peter J. Sluka
Last year, my co-blogger Frank McRoberts offered a construction of the Business Corporation Law that gave creditors and potential creditors an alternative: a path to insert themselves (and their claims) into a contested dissolution proceeding. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12]  Wood v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:55 am by jonathanturley
” The reason cited is his opinion he wrote in the 1987 case of McCleskey v. [read post]