Search for: "Franks v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 4,746
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2024, 10:02 am by Marie Nganele
Supreme Court took aim at the administrative state in its most recent term, especially in its 6-3 SEC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 2:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Frank is a familiar attorney fee claim with a legal malpractice defense and counterclaim. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Michael McConnell discusses Trump v. [read post]
The Court of Appeal was clear, in the earlier case of Vestel v Access Advance [2021] EWCA Civ 440, that it is impermissible under English law to bring a free-standing claim for declaratory relief in relation to a FRAND licence. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:11 am by Binaifer Nowrojee
This is part of a remarkable trend with the ICJ hearing a flurry of cases with a human rights focus, from the Gambia v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm by Meredith Ervine
This Fried Frank alert identifies these key takeaways: – The decision reaffirms that, generally, directors will not face Caremark liability unless the factual context is extreme. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 1:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Several other states also filed regulatory enforcement actions against Centene. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 8:00 am by Sherica Celine
The practice note contains discussion on the implications of federal preemption in U.S. banking regulation and changes affecting federal preemption of state consumer protection laws under the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 9:40 am by Eugene Volokh
”] From yesterday's decision by Judge Frank Whitney (W.D.N.C.) in McBride v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 1:05 am by INFORRM
The draft regulation is now under debate in the Council of States. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 12:05 am by Paul Caron
Saturday: This Week's Ten Most Popular TaxProf Blog Posts Columbia Law Professor Katherine Franke May Be Fired Following Complaint Filed By Two Colleagues Clarifying The Uncertainty Over Direct And Indirect Taxes In Moore v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:20 pm by CFM Admin
In addition to the violations surrounding hypothetical performance, one adviser was also found to have (i) made false and misleading statements, (ii) advertised misleading model performance, (iii) been unable to substantiate performance shown in its advertisements, (iv) failed to enter into written agreements with people it compensated for endorsements, and (v) violated recordkeeping and compliance standards including filing a prospectus with the SEC which contained misleading statements… [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
The fear of a retaliatory prosecution is no illusion: The authors examine a recent Texas case, Villarreal v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:24 am by Beatrice Yahia
” Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]