Search for: "Franks v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 4,658
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Lockwood v County of Suffolk 2023 NY Slip Op 04316 Decided on August 16, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Matter of Lockwood v County of Suffolk 2023 NY Slip Op 04316 Decided on August 16, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 12:26 am by Frank Cranmer
The prohibition came before Queensland’s State Court of Appeal in Athwal v State of Queensland  [2023] QCA 156, in which Ms Kamaljit Kaur Athwal argued that the ban was discriminatory. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Scott Burris
Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 4:40 am by SHG
Giving full effect to the right to free speech in a pluralistic democratic society requires acknowledging and addressing the ways in which those who are members of “discrete and insular minorities,” United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 7:34 am by Zak Gowen
Most banks in the country do not service cannabis companies as marijuana remains illegal at the federal level despite several states legalizing its medicinal and recreational use. . . . [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 11:51 pm by Frank Cranmer
Cite this article as: Frank Cranmer, "Asylum and fear of religious persecution in India: SSHD v Lata" in Law & Religion UK, 24 July 2023, https://lawandreligionuk.com/2023/07/24/asylum-and-fear-of-religious-persecution-in-india-sshd-v-lata/. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 5:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the plaintiff failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice because the plaintiff’s allegation that the restaurant would have had increased profits but for the defendants’ alleged malpractice is [*2]conclusory and speculative (see York v Frank, 209 AD3d at 807; Denisco v Uysal, 195 AD3d at 991). [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 11:52 pm by Frank Cranmer
Quick links Harriet Gray, Lexology: Balancing beliefs in the workplace: lessons from Higgs v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Kay, Mike Kesner, and Ed Sim, Pay Governance LLC, on Wednesday, July 12, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Executive Compensation, Pay for performance, SEC enforcement, TSR The Developing Litigation Risks from the ESG Backlash in the United States Posted by Rick S. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Kay, Mike Kesner, and Ed Sim, Pay Governance LLC, on Wednesday, July 12, 2023 Tags: Disclosure, Dodd-Frank Act, Executive Compensation, Pay for performance, SEC enforcement, TSR The Developing Litigation Risks from the ESG Backlash in the United States Posted by Rick S. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 7:02 am by SCOTUSblog
It can double as an all-expenses-paid trip (Brian Slodysko, The Associated Press) The Supreme Court Case That Has Me Worried, for Survivors and for My State (Kathy Hochul, The New York Times) Senate Democrats announce vote to advance Supreme Court ethics bill (Sahil Kapur & Frank Thorp V, NBC News) Neither party can count on the Supreme Court to be its ally (Mitch McConnell, The Washington Post) Supreme Court Affirmative Action Ruling Harms Black UNC Students Like Me… [read post]