Search for: "Freda v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
*Simon Johnson is a partner and Freda Chan is an associate at Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Sydney. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 4:16 pm
The Appellate Division issued an interesting unreported (non-precedential) opinion on November 20, 2008 in the case of Freda v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 11:19 pm
For example, in Freda v Board of Educ. of City of New York, 224 A.D.2d 360, the court ruled that the NYC Police Retirement System could “recoup” over $100,000 of the retirement allowance that had be paid to Freda because the required §211 approval had not been obtained prior to his being reemployed by the New York City Board of Education following his retirement from the New York City Police Department.Such wavers are not required with respect to such… [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 4:00 am
For example, in Freda v Board of Educ. of City of New York, 224 A.D.2d 360, the court ruled that the NYC Police Retirement System could "recoup" over $100,000 of the retirement allowance that had be paid to Freda because the required §211 approval had not been obtained prior to his being reemployed by the New York City Board of Education following his retirement from the New York City Police Department.Such wavers are not required with respect to… [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Lucy F Reed & James Freda, Maxwell Lecture: After ICCA Singapore, After ICCA Miami: The Next QuestionsCase CommentsCharles T Kotuby, Jr & James Egerton-Vernon, Apotex Inc v The Government of the United States of America: Will Barriers to Jurisdiction Inhibit an Emerging Trend? [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:39 am
For example, in Freda v Board of Educ. of City of New York, 224 A.D.2d 360, the court ruled that the NYC Police Retirement System could “recoup” over $100,000 of the retirement allowance that had be paid to Freda because the required §211 approval had not been obtained prior to his being reemployed by the New York City Board of Education following his retirement from the New York City Police Department. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:25 am by Tom Lamb
Supreme Court made a ruling on the federal preemption legal issue in these Fosamax cases in May 2019 (see Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:26 am by Peter Mahler
I can only guess those factors were at play in Berman v Jankelowitz, 2019 NY Slip Op 32439(U) [Sup Ct NY County Aug. 15, 2019], a lawsuit brought by inactive, minority members of several LLCs formed to create and operate a pair of bistro-style restaurants known as Jack’s Wife Freda, located in Manhattan’s Soho and West Village neighborhoods. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Article V, §6, in pertinent part, requires that “Appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive…. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 11:43 am
Reed & James Freda, Narrow Exceptions: A Review of Recent U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 11:33 am by Tarek Maalouf
 Many hope that the law and ensuing litigation will convince the Supreme Court to reexamine their decision in Roe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 8:54 am by Georgialee Lang
Judge Freda Wolfson presided over the State’s application, and refused to dismiss the fathers’ action, relying on a 2013 appellate decision, B.S. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:14 am
As to applying the doctrine of estoppel in this case, Judge Mendez ruled that the doctrine could only be applied against a governmental entity if failure to apply the doctrine would defeat a right legally and rightfully obtained.Citing Freda v. [read post]