Search for: "Frederick Gedicks" Results 21 - 40 of 87
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Resnicoff, Circumcision Safety: A Case Study in the Failure of Leaderships, (Looking Forward, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 1-7, June 2014).Archana Mishra, Rights in Separate Property of Hindu Female – Challenge to Acquire a New Self , (June 20, 2014).Hendrik Gommer, The Biological Foundations of Global Ethics and Law, (Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (ARSP), 2014, Vol. 100, nr. 2, p. 151-175).Frederick Mark Gedicks, Religion, Meaning, Life, Truth, (San Diego Law… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Triger, Golda Meir's Reluctant Feminism: The Pre-State Years, (Israel Studies, 19.3 (Fall 2014), Forthcoming).Frederick Mark Gedicks & Andrew Koppelman, Invisible Women: Why an Exemption for Hobby Lobby Would Violate the Establishment Clause, (67 Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc 51 (2014)).Raphael Cohen-Almagor, Reconciling Liberalism and Judaism? [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:16 am by Amy Howe
” At Cornerstone, Frederick Mark Gedicks contends that the oral arguments in the challenges to the Affordable Care Act’s birth-control mandate “exposed three serious difficulties in Hobby Lobby’s challenge . . . which the Court will have to address if it decides the case in Hobby Lobby’s favor. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:39 am by Amy Howe
In a post at ACSblog, Frederick Gedicks discusses Justice Clarence Thomas’s separate opinion in Town of Greece v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Smith and Frederick Mark Gedicks. 21 Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 1-486 (2013). [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 4:52 am by Amy Howe
” Briefly: At ACSblog, Frederick Gedicks offers his take on last week’s oral arguments in the challenges to the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate, concluding that, although it “may be that ‘Justice Kennedy thinks Hobby Lobby is an abortion case,’ . . . it seems just as likely that he will see it as a gay -rights case – and that would be good news for the contraception mandate. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:12 am by Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle
   The briefs for Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Woods utterly ignore this line of cases, but an amicus brief by Frederick Gedicks and other church-state scholars has brought these ideas into the center of the conversation. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Press, Forthcoming)).Frederick Mark Gedicks, Brief of Amici Curiae Church-State Scholars in Support of the Government in Sebelius v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 5:28 am by Reproductive Rights
Frederick Mark Gedicks (BYU Law School) has posted the Brief of Amici Curiae Church-State Scholars in Support of the Government in Sebelius v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:05 pm by Michael Perry
Amici on the brief--some of whom post here at RLL--are Frederick Mark Gedicks (Brigham Young University Law School), Vincent Blasi (Columbia Law School); Caitlin Borgmann (CUNY School of Law), Caroline Mala Corbin (University of Miami School of Law), Sarah Barringer Gordon (University of Pennsylvania Law School & Dept. of History), Steven K. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 6:50 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Frederick Gedicks weighs in on the birth-control mandate cases, urging the Court to “ensure the liberty of all Americans by rejecting the efforts of for-profit businesses to impose their owners’ religion on employees. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm by Reproductive Rights
The Washington Post (op-ed): Exemptions from the ‘contraception mandate’ threaten religious liberty, by Frederick Mark Gedicks: Can my employer make me pay the cost of practicing his religion? [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 5:29 pm by Michael Perry
That's the title of an op-ed by BYU law professor Frederick Mark Gedicks. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 4:51 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At ACSblog, Frederick Mark Gedicks discusses the challenges to the ACA’s contraceptive mandate and urges the Court to “make clear that large, for-profit corporations are not protected by RFRA, because such large entities are not and cannot reasonably be perceived as ‘exercising religion’ when they operate unambiguously secular enterprises for commercial profit. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
”   Frederick Mark Gedicks analyzes the cases in a guest post at ACSblog. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 10:03 am
Frederick Mark Gedicks, Brigham Young University Law School, and Pasquale Annicchino, European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS), have published Cross, Crucifix, Culture: An Approach to the Constitutional Meaning of Religious Symbols. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Tenenbaum, The Union of Contraceptive Services and the Affordable Care Act Gives Birth to First Amendment Concerns, (Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 23, No. 3, p. 539, 2013).Frederick Mark Gedicks & Pasquale Annicchino, Lautsi v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 11:05 am by Guest Blogger
Although the courts have so far ignored it, and as Frederick Gedicks and Rebecca Van Tassell argue in a recent and important article, the same principle applies in the contraception mandate litigation. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Ballor, The Ecumenical Challenge of Catholicity, (Journal of Christian Legal Thought 3, No. 2 (Fall 2013)).Caroline Mala Corbin, Corporate Religious Liberty, (September 18, 2013).Frederick Mark Gedicks & Rebecca G. [read post]