Search for: "Free v. Bland" Results 101 - 120 of 124
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
" Denial of a motion to suppress evidence in a prosecution for being a felon in possession of ammunition is reversed where, under the circumstances, the governmental interest in investigating a previous trespass did not outweigh defendant's personal interest to be free from arbitrary interference by police. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:04 pm by Larry Catá Backer
Note I do not give it the modern and fairly bland reading, but seek to place it more profoundly within its historical context. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 1:23 pm
But then the tide turned, and in Miami Herald v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
The Parties Settle a Complaint of Sex Discrimination in Employment The case of L.C.C. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
The Parties Settle a Complaint of Sex Discrimination in Employment The case of L.C.C. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
Raleigh, NC 27673 Phone: (919) 733-9250; (V/TTY); (800) 821-6922 (V/TTY/Toll Free in NC only) Fax: (919) 733-9173 Pathways to the Future, Inc. 525 Mineral Springs Drive Sylva, NC 28779 Phone: (828) 631-1167(V/TTY) Fax: (828) 631-1169 E-mail: pathways@main.nc.us State ADA Coordinator Larry Jones NC Office on the ADA 217 West Jones Street Raleigh, NC 27603-1336 Phone: (919) 715-2302 (V/TTY) E-mail: Larry.Jones@ncmail.net Web:… [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:02 pm
But I will limit myself here to two points: (1) this sounds a good deal like it is treating items of "traditional" culture as an "input" into a transformative, participatory process -- which runs into the objection that Professor Sunder herself raises earlier, about treating the products of intellectual creativity instrumentally, in the manner of an economist; and (2) it tends to take the existence of cultural artifacts as given ("tradition") or at least trivial… [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:53 am by Eoin Daly
For the most part, therefore, McKenna (no 2) sketched a broad frame of principle which Governments subsequently have been relatively free to interpret. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:19 pm by Corynne McSherry
The Office also suggests the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Lenz v Universal Music was mistaken. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:44 am by Charon QC
Obiter J considers the complex case of A Local Authority v E [2012] Court of Protection ~ Anorexic patient ~ Capacity to refuse treatment “We only live once – we are born once and we die once – and the difference between life and death is the biggest difference we know” – Peter Jackson J   In the Court of Protection, Peter Jackson J has given judgment in A Local Authority v E [2012] EWHC 1639 (COP). [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 6:33 am
I wrote about the California Supreme Court's decision in The Oakland Raiders v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 5:31 pm
Kennedy, who often is sympathetic to free-speech arguments, asked  only a few, unrevealing questions. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
This is a lawsuit brought by Twitter users and the Knight Foundation against President Trump (and his social media strategist and press secretary). [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 6:02 pm
"[16] Besides this bland statement, the E.E.O.C has not been extremely helpful to employers in defining whether certain incentives convert an otherwise voluntary program into an involuntary one through financial coercion. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[71] People may sometimes be willing to tolerate speech that they view as offensive and evil, if they perceive that it's protected by a broadly accepted free speech norm. [read post]