Search for: "Free v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 38,094
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
Jacques Derenne asks Commission v World Duty Free Group a.o.: Selectivity in (Fiscal) State Aid, quo vadis Curia? [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:02 am
§§ 2000bb to 2000bb-4)(“the RFRA”).[6] (Even though the RFRA was held unconstitutional as applied to state and local governments, City of Boerne v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 10:49 am
From the sounds of the on-the-ground reports I am getting, it seems that United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
The post SCOTUS states limits on Gun-Free School Zones (United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 2:34 pm
Answer: Yes, according to the recent Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 12:57 pm
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Mo. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 2:34 pm
Answer: Yes, according to the recent Court of Appeals decision in State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 8:41 am
Spencer v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions; Moore v Secretary of State for Transport and Another Court of Appeal “A cause of action for damages against the government for failure to implement Community law resulting in failure to provide a remedy in a personal injury case accrued as soon as some measurable damage had been suffered The Court of Appeal so stated when dismissing the appeals of: (i) Derek Keith Spencer against the dismissal… [read post]
5 May 2021, 6:05 am
On today’s episode take a deep dive with the NC DWI Guy into the facts within State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:27 pm
United States (sustaining independent regulatory commissions) and Morrison v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 10:31 am
R (Shields) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWHC 3102 (Admin); [2008] WLR (D) 398 “The Secretary of State for Justice had power to consider exercising the royal prerogative of mercy to grant a free pardon in respect of a person convicted and sentenced by a foreign court but transferred to the United Kingdom to [...] [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:21 am
R (A) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] EWCA Civ 225; [2009] WLR (D) 113 “A failed asylum seeker was not ‘ordinarily resident’ within the United Kingdom for the purposes of entitlement to treatment as of right by the National Health Service free of charge. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
As the court stated in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:55 pm
Presley v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:29 am
Kraft and State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
See State of Tennessee v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 2:03 am
Making control orders compatible Secretary of State for the Home Department v MB Same v AF House of Lords “Statutory provisions governing the court's powers in reviewing nonderogating control orders made by the Secretary of State for the Home Department under the Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 were to be read down in accordance with section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 where their effect would otherwise deny the controlled person a fair hearing… [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 2:22 am
RB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; U (Algeria) v Same House of Lords “Appeals from decisions of the Special Immigration Appeals Commission were restricted to questions of law or irrationality. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:09 am
Here is the abstract: This article addresses judicial choices and errors involved in United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:14 am
Regina (A) v Secretary of State for Health Court of Appeal “A failed asylum seeker was not ordinarily resident in the United Kingdom so as to be entitled to free treatment by the National Health Service. [read post]
