Search for: "Free v. State" Results 181 - 200 of 35,646
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2014, 8:29 am by Howard Friedman
United States, (3d Cir., Dec. 12, 2014), the 3rd Circuit affirmed the dismissal of an inmate's claim that a correctional officer's pat down search of his genital area violated his free exercise rights because his religion prohibits homosexual activity.In Goninan v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:02 pm by aaronklaw
District Court, in the Old Dominion state of Virginia, an employment lawsuit ostensibly fit for a modern-day Atticus Finch was recently heard – Bland v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:47 pm by Aaron Lindstrom
Lindstrom is the solicitor general of Michigan, which filed an amicus brief with 19 other states in support of Mark Janus in Janus v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:30 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 5709 (NY App, July 20, 2017), a New York state appeals court held that a Muslim inmate's free exercise claim growing out of a pat frisk by a female corrections officer cannot be asserted in the state Court of Claims.In Potts v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 4:37 am
Supreme Court denied certiorari today was a prisoner free exercise case-- Washington v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:16 am by Nassiri Law
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the court held that states are now free to pass laws that outlaw abortions. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 7:45 am
Samantha Barbas, State University of New York (SUNY), Buffalo, Law School, is publishing When Privacy Almost Won: Time, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 8:34 am
Regina (C) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “Secondary legislation laid before Parliament three weeks after a report sent by the Youth Justice Board to the directors of privatised secure training centres holding children, following two deaths in custody, was quashed as procedurally flawed and in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 10:42 am
Helow v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Another House of Lords “A judge's membership of a Jewish association whose magazine had expressed partisan views against Palestinian causes did not in itself imply that the judge shared or endorsed such views so as to have raised the possibility of bias and want of impartiality when determining an immigration appeal by a Palestinian activist. [read post]