Search for: "Free v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 39,620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2016, 8:35 am
The Supreme Court has held that the Secretary of State is free to order service of documents on a person within the jurisdiction and that doing so is an administrative process and not one that attaches to it obligations on the Secretary of State to investigate the nature of the proceedings behind the request. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 1:35 pm
However plaintiff was permitted to proceed with claims alleging excessive force and equal protection violations, and allowed him to amend his complaint to allege that he has exhausted administrative remedies as to his state law claims involving free exercise and equal protection violations.In Richard v. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 11:30 pm
In Henderson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 2:29 pm
Recent Free Speech v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:19 am
The general rule in such “free speech” cases was set out in Connick v Myers, 461 US 138. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 10:14 am
Salt Lake County, (UT App., May 31, 2013), a Utah state appellate court dismissed a Jewish inmate's claim that his free exercise, due process and freedom from involuntary servitude rights were violated while he was a pre-trial detainee. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 7:47 am
LEXIS 182968 (D KA, Nov. 3, 2017), a Kansas federal district court held that plaintiff had stated a free exercise claim regarding his inability to receive a kosher diet. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 8:23 am
LEXIS 183982, Sept. 11, 2012) and dismissed an inmate's free exercise claim. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
The inmate conceded that the denial would not hinder his free exercise of religion.In Gillen v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
See State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
On July 28, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 5:20 am
LEXIS 53236 (D AZ, May 6, 2010), an Arizona federal district court concluded that an inmate failed to state a free exercise claim in his complaint that food items were missing from his trays.In Cosco v. [read post]
23 May 2010, 10:00 am
In Barhite v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 4:41 am
EB (Togo) and Another v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Very lengthy delay in processing an application for indefinite leave to remain by a National Health Service employee who had returned to the UK despite a deportation order did not invalidate the order. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 3:37 am
Judicial review not available Regina (F (Mongolia)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Judicial review was not available to challenge a refusal by the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal to grant permission to appeal against an immigration judge's decision. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 2:12 am
Closed material can be used in appeals against deportation MT and Others (Algeria) v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 1:59 am
No duty of care owed over child support R (Rowley and others) v. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:33 am
Regina (Baiai and Another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department House of Lords “Speeches July 30, 2008 The statutory scheme requiring the permission of the Secretary of State for the Home Department for marriage by people who were subject to immigration control or were illegal entrants was disproportionate and infringed the right to marry protected by article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 11:48 am
Trump, it is, as the caption of the Supreme Court's decision unwittingly states: Trump v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:24 am
Free speech limitations on public employees Wasson v Sonoma Co. [read post]
