Search for: "Free v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 39,608
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2024, 7:16 am by Eric Goldman
Amicus brief from Institute for Free Speech claiming to be in support of neither side, but mostly in support of Florida’s law Amicus briefs in support of Florida: 10 State AGs Babylon Bee Florida’s opening brief on appeal. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:11 am by Binaifer Nowrojee
This is part of a remarkable trend with the ICJ hearing a flurry of cases with a human rights focus, from the Gambia v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 5:53 am by jonathanturley
Carter’s narrow view of free speech and his expansive view of state authority is hardly unique. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 3:56 am by jonathanturley
The state itself has moved aggressively against free speech rights of doctors and others in areas like abortion. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.) [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Nazune Menka
In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court held in Becerra v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:03 pm by Reference Staff
Olmstead is a civil rights decision freeing people from unnecessary confinement simply because states preferred institutions over community-based treatment. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:09 am by Steven Schwartzapfel
The trial judge uses something called the Daubert standard (in reference to a case called Daubert v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Where were they commanded to stay the course and where were they free to navigate for themselves? [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 4:32 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
The agreement specifically stated that Wife was free to live anywhere and with anyone she deemed fit but that Husband’s obligation to pay support would terminate upon Wife’s cohabitation. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:56 am by Katharina Schmid (schmid-ip)
The case-law of a Member State, while it is not binding on the EU Courts, may provide relevant indications about the relevant public’s perception of the sign at issue in that state (see para 58, with reference to GC judgment T-40/03 – Julián Murúa Entrena, EU:T:2005:285, para 69). [read post]