Search for: "Free v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 39,594
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2013, 2:13 pm
Ct., March 27, 2013), the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court ruled that a Nation of Islam inmate can move ahead with his claims that the lack of separate Nation of Islam services violates his federal and state free exercise rights. [read post]
29 May 2008, 1:36 am
Regina (HSMP Forum Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench Division “The introduction of a new and more restrictive regime for highly skilled immigrants was unlawful because it prejudiced people already admitted to the UK under an earlier regime by reducing their opportunity to gain permanent rights of residency. [read post]
27 May 2008, 1:34 am
SK (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “While the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal had power to pronounce an oral decision at the conclusion of a hearing, it was the written determination which constituted the decision. [read post]
30 May 2007, 2:52 am
Arbitrary delay in parole hearing Regina (Johnson) v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 8:25 am
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion in Espinoza v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:50 am
Sony Third Circuit Says Google Isn’t State Actor–Jayne v. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 4:00 am
LEXIS 80099 (MD TN, Oct. 16, 2006), a Tennessee federal district court rejected a convicted prisoner's claim that his free exercise of religion is infringed by the state's capital punishment law that calls for him to choose between electrocution or lethal injection as his method of execution, and mandates lethal injection if he fails to choose.The decision in Nicholas v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 11:59 am
LEXIS 26312, Jan. 31, 2013) and dismissed an inmate's free exercise claims regarding not receiving a pork-free diet while a pre-trial detainee.In Duwenhoegger v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 4:05 am
In Clark v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 11:38 am
One important Kennedy opinion pointing in the other direction was United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 10:15 am
The court's rationale is that the plaintiffs are likely to succeed on their claim that the state violated the Free Exercise Clause because in exempting (without discernible justification) certain non-religious activities, the state's purported risk-based regulations were not generally applicable. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:59 pm
The North Carolina Court of Appeals published a decision in a free-speech retaliation case in Ginsberg v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:07 am
In United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:54 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:20 am
Morrissey-Berru, Tanzin v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 9:13 pm
Kahle v. [read post]
1 Dec 2013, 9:16 am
LEXIS 167347, Nov. 4, 2013), and held that a suit in which an inmate alleged he had been improperly removed from a faith-based dormitory and retaliated against for grieving the incident was properly removed from state to federal court, despite plaintiff's state law allegations.In Petty v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 2:30 am
Regina (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport House of Lords “The prohibition on political advertising in broadcast media was necessary in a democratic society and not incompatible with the freedom of expression guaranteed by article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 3:40 am
Judicial review not available Regina (F (Mongolia)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Judicial review was not available to challenge a refusal by the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal to grant permission to appeal against an immigration judge's decision. [read post]
