Search for: "Free v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 39,620
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2024, 3:14 pm by Joseph Stacey
Preliminary investigations revealed that the F/V KIM THU failed to comply with the “Hot Works” permit guidelines issued by the State Department of Transportation. [read post]
10 Sep 2024, 4:21 am by Malcolm Hartwell
Conversely, it means that parties must be free not to contract under terms they do not agree to, and therefore free to refuse an offer of non-contractual performance. [read post]
A notable example is the leading Johnson & Johnson v Scitech, in which the São Paulo State Court granted permanent injunction, material and moral damages for the infringement of surgical stapler IP rights. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Do (or should) the implications of the ratification process, Texas v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 6:18 am by Alden Abbott
US v RealPage Inc The DOJ complaint RealPage is a software producer. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
Tax-free proceeds: The insurance proceeds received by individual shareholders are generally tax-free. [read post]
7 Sep 2024, 3:47 am by Eleonora Rosati
The second, third and fourth questions concern whether, in the light of certain provisions of EU law, in particular the relevant provisions of [the InfoSoc Directive] and of Article 17(2) of the Charter, Member States are free to apply the reciprocity clause contained in Article 2(7) of the Berne Convention to works of applied art. [read post]
Brief Introduction: On July 1, 2024, the Western District of Louisiana ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in the case, State of Louisiana et al. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 5:03 am by Frank Cranmer
(For a more detailed analysis, see Dirk Voorhoof, Strasbourg Observers: Sokolovskiy v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 5:00 am
”In so ruling the court in Wingate relied upon the Pennsylvania Superior Court decision in the case of Blumer v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 10:01 pm by rhapsodyinbooks
District Court panel ruled two-to-one that segregation on Alabama’s intrastate buses was unconstitutional, citing Brown v. [read post]