Search for: "Free v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 39,340
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
On 1 March 2024, The Rt Hon Lucy Frazer MP, the Secretary of State for Culture Media and Sport, and The Rt Hon James Cleverly MP, the Secretary of State for the Home Department, published their decision to vary a Restriction Order from the Leveson Inquiry to allow the use of the ledger cards for the purpose of the ongoing misuse of private information claim brought by seven claimants against Associated Newspapers. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:42 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Tickets are free, but there is again an option to make a donation to charity by purchasing a special ticket – the event will be supporting Bowel Cancer UK once more (please give generously!). [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm by Orin S. Kerr
This is the same mistake that the initial Fifth Circuit panel made in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:26 pm by Ilya Somin
There have been several previous such cases, including three appellate court decisions, and Judge Ezra's own recent ruling in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:16 pm by Tom Ginsburg
The famous Brandeis brief appears around that time, in such cases as Muller v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 1:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
OpenAI's initial research was performed in the open, providing free and public access to designs, models, and code. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm by Barbara Moreno
Samantha Barbas, Actual Malice:  Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am by Rachel Kleinfeld
Supreme Court had taken on new powers (in their case, the power of constitutional review) in the 1803 case, Marbury v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:05 am by Frank Cranmer
” This general principle and Edge’s “fundamental state value” were considered in the case of Redmond-Bate v Director Of Public Prosecutions [1999] EWHC Admin 733, in which three Christian fundamentalists successfully appealed against a decision of conviction under s.89(2) Police Act 1996 and the evaluation of an imminent breach of the peace was considered. [read post]