Search for: "Free v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 39,349
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2009, 9:23 am
As explained by the Appeals Court, this case involves procedural challenges to a United States Forest Service Rule known as the "State Petitions Rule. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:14 am by marcorandazza
In my view, this was the single most important free speech case the United States Supreme Court has ever decided. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 9:14 am by marcorandazza
In my view, this was the single most important free speech case the United States Supreme Court has ever decided. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 2:07 am
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina Queen’s Bench Division “A foreign state was not entitled to claim sovereign immunity to avoid enforcement of a judgment validly obtained in another overseas jurisdiction. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am by Eric Goldman
On Monday, a unanimous three-judge panel of the 11th Circuit issued an important Internet free speech opinion, NetChoice v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
That’s not how it’s supposed to work [my Free State Notes on a Maryland “cyberbullying” bill] Local laws requiring government contractors to disclose/disclaim ties to the anti-Israel BDS movement have rightly come under criticism. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 2:55 am by tracey
MM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: [2012] EWCA Civ 135;  [2012] WLR (D)  36 ” ‘Conspicuous unfairness’ was not a free standing ground in an immigration case on which a court could act in the absence of unlawful action on the part of the Home Secretary.” WLR Daily, 24th January 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:56 pm by INFORRM
The decision handed down last week by the United States Supreme Court in United States v Stevens shows the radically different approach taken in the United States in relation questions of “extreme” and “offensive” freedom of expression. [read post]
18 May 2021, 9:25 am by Robbie Stern
On 10 May 2021, the Supreme Court heard the appeal in R (Majera) (formerly SM (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (“SSHD”). [read post]
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 11:30 am by Eric Goldman
This is an unusual discussion, so I will quote it in full: Congress has provided that “[i]t is the policy of the United States … to preserve the vibrant and competitive free market that presently exists for the Internet and other interactive computer services, unfettered by Federal or State Regulation …. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 3:30 am
But many other states also consider their state constitution to provide broader free speech rights than the United States Constitution, so the effect of this ruling may be felt by shopping malls across the country. [read post]