Search for: "Free v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 39,356
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2007, 2:15 am
Fact sheet not unambiguous Hooper v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “A government fact sheet was not clear and unambiguous enough so that overpayments of incapacity benefit were not recoverable from a person receiving the benefit who took up part-time paid employment without notifying the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions in breach of statute. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 10:32 am
Regina (JL) (a Youth) v Secretary of State for Justice House of Lords “A near-suicide in custody which resulted in the prisoner's mental incapacity triggered the state’s obligation to institute an independent initial investigation which complied with article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, protecting the right to life. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:36 am
Othman (Jordan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A foreign national could not be deported on national security grounds to a state where he was at real risk of being tried on evidence obtained by torture because such an expulsion would contravene his right to a fair trial guaranteed by article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 2:17 am
Asylum Act provision is incompatible Regina (Nasseri) v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:20 pm
Pacific on Mazza v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
MY (Turkey) v Secretary of State for Home Department Court of Appeal “Where an immigration judge found a witness to be reliable and accepted his evidence, it was inappropriate and an error of law for another immigration judge at a second hearing to attack the credibility of the same witness. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 3:35 am
Casewell v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “The payment of an allowance to a disabled wife to pay for carer service was part of the husband's income for assessing his income support if he was that carer. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 2:33 am
Compensation scheme withdrawal is lawful R (Niazi) v. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:13 am
Additional facts inadmissible in extradition Edwards v Government of United States of America “In deciding whether there was dual criminality in extradition, the domestic court was confined to the facts alleged in the offence specified in the extradition request. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:29 pm
Supreme Court described it in Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:19 pm
The Constitution says that Congress (and the States) may not abridge the right to free speech. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 4:58 am
Last year, in Whorton v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 12:59 pm
., it will now offer free online access to historical U.S. legal materials, which include the following: United States Code 1925-1988 (includes content up to 1993) From Guide to Law Online: United States Law United States Reports v. 1-542 (1754-2004) From Guide to Law Online: United States Judiciary Code of Federal Regulations (1938-1995) From Guide to Law Online: Executive Federal Register v.… [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 12:57 pm
A more recent example might be United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 11:00 am
Washington State Department of Corrections, 2013 U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 9:42 am
Gristede's Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 11:01 am
LEXIS 86082 (D NV, June 30, 2016), a Nevada federal district court held that petitioners had stated a colorable free exercise claim based on the lack of halal-certified meals, but dismissed without prejudice ordering each petitioner to file separately stating allegations specific to him.In Green v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 10:07 am
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution includes both an establishment clause and a free exercise clause. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 4:10 am
In Samaj v. [read post]
