Search for: "French v. First Union Securities, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 62
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Power Workers’ Union v Elexicon Energy Inc., 2022 CanLII 7228 96. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:01 am by MBettman
University Community Tenants Union, Inc., 42 Ohio St.2d 242 (1975) (“Once speech has judicially been found libelous, if all the requirements for injunctive relief are met, an injunction for restraint of continued publication of that same speech may be proper. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:21 am by .
Rogers Communications Inc., 2011 BCSC 1196 United Food and Commercial Workers’ International Union, Local 1518 v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2016-02-13 https://t.co/rzO2XdxDnf -> Inspection of property granted in copyright case Strathearn Consulting Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
Professor Chiariny, who answered to the first question two weeks ago, will address today the second one. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
The first of these is GO Outdoors Ltd v Skechers USA Inc II [2015] EWHC 1405 (Ch), a 19 May decision of Mrs Justice Rose, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, on an appeal from a decision of the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Sometime prior to 1980, Harold Green and Frances Green opened an investment account at the Union Bank of Switzerland (“UBS account”); Harold Green designated Alice as a joint owner. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The judgement of HHJ Moloney QC in the curious international harassment case of Power Places Tours Inc & Ors v Free Spirit [2015] EWHC 3886 (QB) given on 10 December 20 [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
Nina Totenberg of NPR writes that Kennedy “may feel secure in his legacy. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 10:43 pm
Consequently, a person who files an application for registration of a sign as a trade mark cannot rely, to his advantage and in order to secure an identical decision, on a possibly unlawful act committed to the benefit of someone else. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 7:05 am by MBettman
On the same day, Lewis executed a mortgage that identified First Union as the “lender” and identified Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP tango) ECJ sets aside partial refusal to grant CTM for ‘Vorsprung durch Technik’ (progress through technology): Audi AG v OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) (The IP Factor) ECJ: Davidoff criteria for exhaustion apply also if goods were first marketed within the EEA: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV and others v Diesel SpA (JIPLP) Time for a general grumble - General Court decisions missing images, no English version: G-Star Raw Denim kft v OHIM, ESGW… [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
  First, the claimants in group litigation claim of against Morrisons Supermarket successfully established that the defendant was vicariously liable for a data leak (Various Claimants v W M Morrisons Supermarket plc [2017] EWHC 3113 (QB)). [read post]
18 May 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
The IPKat: There is (copyright) life on the planet of the APIs http://t.co/toitlR5Th2 -> Legal Theory Blog: Rub on Copyright Exhaustion (the First-Sale Doctrine) http://t.co/BpfMDEtcni -> Oracle vs. [read post]