Search for: "French v. Foods, Inc."
Results 61 - 80
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
Fido's Fences, Inc (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) 9th Circuit finds in favour of Paris Hilton in her suit against Hallmark Cards for violating her right of publicity and using her THAT’S HOT registered trademark without permission: Hilton… [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 9:01 am
Rabbinica[l] Council of America, Inc. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
(IP Dragon) Colombia Legal victory for Coca Cola over trade mark (IP tango) Denmark Danish Supreme Court affirms decision forcing food stall operator using ORIENTEXPRESSEN to change her trade mark (Class 46) Europe Questions on acquiescence for ECJ in Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EWHC questions referred to ECJ in L'Oréal SA v eBay now available on Curia (Class 46)… [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:40 pm
(IP Dragon) Bad faith trade mark registrations: Sony Ericsson v Mr Lui (IPKat) In letter to Chinese government, Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPOA) weakens opposition to 'international exhaustion' (Hal Wegner) IP laws evolving in China (Law360) Colombia Colombia changes trade name deposit requirements (IP tango) FINESSE, MEN'S FITNESS confusingly similar, rules Colombia Council (IP tango) Denmark Court denies injunction request in… [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 10:45 am
, Inc., Superior Court of Paris, May 22, 2000. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
Hendrick v Tony Knight (O-323-14) is a decision of Appointed Person Geoffrey Hobbs QC, involving the sadly-known Tony Knight. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm
Artesyn Technologies, Inc. et al. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:25 pm
In MMM Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:22 am
In this context, she briefly explained the case MZ Wallace, Inc v Fuller d/n/a The Oliver Thomas & Black Diamond, No. 18-2665 (SDNY, Dec. 2018), in which the plaintiff claimed the defendants infringed its trade dress rights in quilting handbags. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 5:28 pm
Thus far, the only claim to reach the courts was brought by David Zindel, son of the Pulitzer prize winner Paul Zindel.Zindel v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
Fage Dairy Processing Industry (TTABlog) Precedential No. 23: Sophistication of buyers leads to TTAB dismissal of CALYPSO section 2(d) opposition and cancellation proceeding: Calypso Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(China Law Blog) Poisonous Optima dog food: product liability or blame the counterfeiters? [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 4:55 am
This one is Chanel Inc. v Chanel’s Salon and Chanel Jones, 2:14-cv-00304, and sees fashion and cosmetics company Chanel as plaintiff. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
GuestKat Cecilia Sbrolli writes Seal the deal: Canadian court waxes off copyright infringement in Pyrrha Design Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:05 pm
TLC Beatrice Int’l Holdings, Inc., the Delaware Court of Chancery agreed to process a quadruple derivative suit involving two separate levels of French wholly-owned subsidiaries by treating the French assets as beneficially held by the Delaware holding company. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 6:52 pm
In Mohanty v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 12:30 pm
Cisco Systems, Inc. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm
K M Imports Inc. (2014 ONSC 1889) the Ontario Superior Court of Justice awarded a company which imports Caribbean food into Canada libel damages of Can$50,000. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Hobby Lobby Stores Bush v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:59 am
(Copyright Litigation Blog) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Golan – Supremes to decide if public domain works can be re-copyrighted (ArsTechnica) (Patently-O) Survivor – Eye of the Tiger: Survivor survives motion to dismiss in copyright royalties dispute: Sullivan dba Survivor v Jamison (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) US Trade Marks – Decisions District Court E D Pennsylvania concludes vendor cannot claim exclusive rights to ‘A Taste of… [read post]
