Search for: "Friedlander v. Friedlander" Results 1 - 20 of 327
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2024, 4:54 am by Peter J. Sluka
  And, as SDNY Judge Koetl’s recent decision in Freedman Normand Friedland LLP v Cyrulnik, 21-CV-1746 (JGK) (SDNY May 15, 2024) (discussed here), demonstrates, even the most high-profile lawyers and experts can get tripped up on the complexities associated with valuing pending contingency-fee cases. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 7:18 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Friedlander, in the context of their differing diagnoses of Salomone’s condition. [read post]
28 May 2024, 3:54 am by Peter J. Sluka
  For some lawyers and experts, the results are in: Freedman Normand Friedland LLP v Cyrulnik, 21-CV-1746 (JGK) (SDNY May 15, 2024). [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:42 pm
(A complication that could have been avoided had someone else written the opinion and then had Judge Friedland join that opinion with the slight addition of her supplemental footnote.)Still, a big day for Judge Friedland, and a way to rock in 2024.P.S. - She almost made it a full decade. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm
Judge Friedland is drawn to replace Judge Watford. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
Ariel and I, along with a very smart young law professor named David Lametti, who later became Minister of Justice, made the prevailing arguments in the SCC in the 2015 case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
The Ninth Circuit only publishes one opinion today, and it reverses the dismissal of a claim by a Jehovah's Witness that requiring her to take a sworn oath as a condition of state employment violates her right to free exercise of religion as well as Title VII and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act.Judge Friedland's opinion concisely describes the relevant dispute: "The California Constitution requires all public employees, except those 'as may be by law… [read post]