Search for: "Friedman v. Beway Realty Corp" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Dec 2012, 2:00 am by Peter Mahler
Beway Realty Corp., 87 NY2d 161 (1995), but agreed that no DLOM should be applied based on the hearing officer’s findings that the subject portfolio of properties had unique attributes rendering shares in the holding corporations readily marketable. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 3:15 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
“[T]here is no difference in analysis between stock fair value determinations under Business Corporation Law 623 and fair value determinations under Business Corporation Law 1118” (Matter of Friedman v Beway Realty Corp., 87 NY2d 161 [1995]). [read post]
23 May 2016, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Dickerson noted that, in declining to apply a minority discount, the trial court cited the Court of Appeals’ 1995 decision in Matter of Friedman v Beway Realty Corp. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:30 am
  Here's what the court said: Nor, contrary to plaintiffs' contention, does the buyout of a deceased partner's interest implicate all of the factors that our courts have relied upon in denying discounts in the corporate minority or dissenting shareholder contexts (see Matter of Penepent Corp., 96 NY2d 186, 194 [2001]; Matter of Friedman v Beway Realty Corp., 87 NY2d 161, 167, 169-170 [1995]). [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 3:50 am by Peter Mahler
Judge Fahey’s opinion, drawing upon the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s 2004 ruling in Anastos v Sable, agreed with the m [read post]