Search for: "Friedman v. City of Los Angeles" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
California (1960) the Supreme Court struck down an ordinance of the city of Los Angeles that made it a crime to distribute any “hand-bill” without the names and addresses of the sponsors. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am by Amanda Rice
Richard Friedman of the Confrontation Blog provides some “preliminary observations” about the opinions issued on Monday in Michigan v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am by Cormac Early
And in the day’s third opinion, the Court (in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg) held in Dan’s City Used Cars v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
” At his eponymous blog, Sheldon Nahmod looks at January’s opinion in City of Escondido, California v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 7:48 pm by Eugene Volokh
After his release, he was subpoenaed to testify before a Los Angeles grand jury continuing its probe into the scheme…. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:55 am by SHG
” At issue in the new case, Friedman v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Zervos has alleged Trump groped and kissed her without her consent in a Los Angeles hotel room in 2007. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White Coats in the State Capital: OB-GYNs become political force in abortion wars Yahoo News – Alice Miranda Ollstein and Megan Messerly (Politico) | Published: 8/22/2022 Physicians, many of whom have never mobilized politically, are banding together in the wake of the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 10:36 am by Schachtman
City of Los Angeles Dep’t of Water and Power v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
Friedman ordered a lawsuit challenging a Bureau of Land Management roundup of thousands of wild horses in Nevada forward, but denied a preliminary injunction to stop the removal of horses, which is scheduled to begin December 28. [read post]