Search for: "Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors"
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
Tracing the early legislative and judicial history of CEQA, the Court observed that its landmark Friends of Mammoth decision construing CEQA to apply to approvals of private projects noted that CEQA “deals…with questions of degree” and that “[f]urther legislative or administra [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162 (holding Napa County’s revised lot line adjustment ordinance properly classified lot line adjustment decisions consistent with the Map Act’s exemption as ministerial in nature and exempt from CEQA); Friends of Juana Briones House v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162 (holding Napa County’s revised lot line adjustment ordinance properly classified lot line adjustment decisions consistent with the Map Act’s exemption as ministerial in nature and exempt from CEQA); Friends of Juana Briones House v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm
” (Citing Friends of Mammoth v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 12:22 pm
Perhaps the single most important CEQA case ever, Friends of Mammoth v Board of Supervisors of Mono County, held that the statute applied to private projects even though it was obvious that the legislature that enacted it did not intend that and the textual authority for such a conclusion was thin at best. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 9:57 am
” (Citing Friends of Mammoth v. [read post]
