Search for: "Frito-Lay North America, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2015, 3:44 am
Frito-Lay North America, Inc., 114 USPQ2d 1827 (Fed. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 5:43 am by Steve Baird
Marketing, creative and design types should pay close attention to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s decision in Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:40 am by Steve Baird
If the TTAB takes the same amount of time in deciding where “pretzel crisps” falls on the Spectrum of Distinctiveness, it will be July before we know the answer, but something tells me the TTAB’s decision in Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 11:25 pm by Steve Baird
We continue to anxiously await the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s decision in Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:30 am by John L. Welch
July 24, 2013 - 2 PM: Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 2:28 am by Steve Baird
Although actual ties seem quite rare in our world of very precise measurement, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) is being asked to decide who wins if there is a “statistical tie” between those relevant consumers who understand a designation as generic and those who understand it as a brand name, as part of a high-profile, four-year-long trademark dispute over registration of the “Pretzel Crisps” snack food product name:… [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:29 am
This is the ruling of Mr Justice Arnold late last month in Innovia Films Ltd v Frito-Lay North America Inc [2012] EWHC 790 (Pat), in the Patents Court (England and Wales). [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 2:36 am by sally
Innovia Films Ltd v Frito-Lay North America Inc [2012] EWHC 790 (Pat); [2012] WLR (D) 107 “Where a court had jurisdiction under section 82(4)(b) of the Patents Act 1977 to determine a question to which section 82 applied, the court’s jurisdiction was exclusive of all other possible jurisdictions.” WLR Daily, 30th March 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:19 am by sally
High Court (Chancery Division) Public Trustee v Butler & Anor [2012] EWHC 858 (Ch) (03 April 2012) DKH Retail Ltd v Republic (Retail) Ltd [2012] EWHC 877 (Ch) (03 April 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) J Preston & Sons Ltd [2012] EWHC 870 (QB) (03 April 2012) Letts v Royal Sun Alliance Plc [2012] EWHC 875 (QB) (03 April 2012) The Serious Organised Crime Agency v Robb [2012] EWHC 803 (QB) (30 March 2012) Sharif, R. v [2012] EWHC 868 (QB) (03 April 2012) Dr A v HTX… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Here is why (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Innovative methods for corporate legal managers to reduce IP counsel costs (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) The malign and the benign of the transfer of know-how (IP finance) How to avoid potential conflict when inventors want their innovations back (Technology Transfer Tactics) 50% of venture capital investment is lost: How your clients can improve these odds by using the right patent analytics (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) New website, Intellogist, compares patent search… [read post]