Search for: "Frye v. Frye" Results 1 - 20 of 687
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Several years ago, Florida lawmakers decided to enact a measure that would alter F.S. 90.702 (testimony by experts) and F.S. 90.704 (basis of opinion testimony by experts), forgoing the so-called “Frye standard” (so named for the 1923 case of Frye v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:59 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   Judge Nealon’s opinion provides a thorough review of the standard set forth under Frye v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 8:18 pm by Media Law Prof
Frye has published "Incidental Intellectual Property" in the Entertainment and Sports Lawyer, v. 33 (Winter 2017). [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 1:49 pm by Commentary:
The Maryland Court of Appeals’ recent opinion in Rochkind v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
  The recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Frye v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
 For expert evidence to be admissible, it met the standard enunciated in the case of Frye v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 7:59 am by South Florida Lawyers
I've spent literally decades learning how to apply the relatively ancient (1923) Frye standard to expert testimony in state court.Now come some whippersnappers (Big Business?) [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The Frye standard of review of novel expert testimony was reaffirmed by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the following two recent decisions.Snizavich v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The Frye standard of review of novel expert testimony was reaffirmed by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the following two recent decisions.Snizavich v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 4:54 pm by Evidence ProfBlogger
In 1923, the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia issued its opinion in Frye v. [read post]