Search for: "Fuentes v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 86
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2017, 8:50 am by Joel R. Brandes
The family resided in Mexico City, Mexico, until April 2015, when Fuentes took the Children on vacation but wrongfully retained them in the United States thereafter. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:30 am by Michael Price
As the Senate Foreign Relations Committee put it: For many years, the United States has embarrassed itself by excluding prominent foreigners from visiting the United States solely because of their political beliefs. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 2:42 am
United States of America), 2008 Alfred Boll, Nottebohm (Lichtenstein v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 10:39 am
•       State control of the fundamental means of production (¶ 63) legitimating/democratizing (¶¶64-65)•       Highest objective: Preserving the state and Revolution (¶¶66; 72)•       Central Planning  is the principal means of socialist development (¶6 [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 1:23 pm by David Ettinger
United States (2011) 564 U.S. __ [131 S.Ct. 2419, 180 L.Ed.2d 285]) in light of People v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 7:59 am by Gene Killian
With that background, consider the New Jersey Supreme Court’s recent decision in Templo Fuente de Vida Corp. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 7:12 am by Guest Writer
And most recently, the Amnesty International USA Board of Directors wrote a letter to Francisco Altschul Fuentes, the Salvadoran Ambassador to the United States, urging him to “help ensure that Teodora del Carmen Vásquez is immediately released” and “to help ensure the release of all other women incarcerated in El Salvador for pregnancy related complications. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 11:43 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In the comments to this Grits post on the exoneration of Carlos Fuentes, Jay Brandon, chief of the Bexar County DA's Conviction Integrity Unit rightly deflected blame from prosecutors in the case. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:02 pm by Brian Toth
Today, the Eleventh Circuit issued an unpublished opinion in Fuentes-Rangel v. [read post]