Search for: "Fullerton Joint Union High School Dist. v. State Bd. of Education"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2016, 5:02 pm
Noting there was no claim the Ordinance would case a direct physical change in the environment, and that the issue whether an activity is a project poses “an issue of law that can be decided on undisputed data in the record or appeal” without deference to the agency (citing Muzzy Ranch, supra, 41 Cal.4th at 381; Fullerton Joint Union High School Dist. v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 11:31 am
Key principles, holdings, and takeaways from the Court’s opinion include: Whether the MOU constituted a “project” requiring CEQA review is reviewed de novo (citing Fullerton Joint Union High School Dist. v. [read post]
