Search for: "Funk v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 89
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2011, 6:05 am
Iowa 2004) (upholding a catheterization performed by hospital personnel on a person detained under the police community-caretaking function); see also United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm by ernst
  In Constitutional Commentary, Kellen Funk reviews Jack N. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 4:13 am by Ben
 Current TPP negotiation member states are the United States, Japan, Mexico, Canada, Australia, Malaysia, Chile, Singapore, Peru, Vietnam, New Zealand and Brunei. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by Stefanie Levine
  Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 10:00 pm
McClary, Case No. 16-15794 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit and can be read here. [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:35 pm by William Funk
That legislative intent was given effect by the Supreme Court in its seminal cases of United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:08 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Dennis Crouch In 1931, the United States Supreme Court decided a landmark case on the patentability of inventions, De Forest Radio Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 10:36 am by Two-Seventy-One Patent Blog
In a  dispute with a Japanese rival, Fujitsu, over mainframe computer operating systems, IBM championed copyright protection for software in the United States and around the world. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by Stefanie Levine
  Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 9:20 am
Such an extension, however, would accord such upward departures even greater protection than they had under the mandatory Guidelines.In United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" But even if they were compelled, he adequately waived his Garrityprotections, United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 2:10 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
United States, discussed the Court’s interpretation of the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act (FSIA), and identified open questions pertaining to the FSIA after the ruling. [read post]