Search for: "Fuss v. Fuss (No. 2)" Results 1 - 20 of 126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2015, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
He then stated that it was for this reason self-represented litigants were generally not entitled to costs. [2] 1465778 Ontario Inc. v. 1122077 Ontario Ltd., 2006 CanLII 35819 (ON CA) [3] Dabbs v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 12:16 pm by Ken Lammers
The BIG FUSS this week has been about United States v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 6:26 am by Mark Tushnet
I finally got around to reading Graham v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm by John Elwood
United States (relisted after the 2/17 Conference) Docket: 11-6606 Issue(s): Whether petitioner’s prior felony conviction under Texas law for conspiracy to commit aggravated robbery is a “violent felony” under the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:36 pm by SJM
In years to come, we may all wonder what all the fuss was about, but Tuesday’s judgement in R (Public Law Project) v the Secretary of State for Justice  has provided some relief and not a little amusement to legal aid practitioners girding themselves for yet another grim landmark in the legal aid story: the residence test. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 9:36 am by Eric Goldman
  The screenshot was transformative because (1) it showed the readers what all of the fuss was about (cite to Barcroft v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
This Kat always wondered what all the fuss is about “Spring break” in the US --being a fan of a good fun holiday break but not necessarily in Spring -- and watched ‘Spring Breakers’ the movie one lazy Sunday night. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 10:05 pm
 We can already hear the Yale law alums griping that Harvard graduates THREE TIMES as many as the New Haven school generates each year (circa 600 v. circa 200). [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 1:59 pm by Giles Peaker
In short, the question is not whether occupation is under s.193(2) per se, but whether the occupation is more than merely transient (Rogerson v Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council [2005] 2 All E R 1000 ). [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
There are diverging views in this respect, as seen recently in the Responses to the Public Consultation on the Review of the EU Copyright Rules (see hereat Section V). [read post]