Search for: "G. v. S."
Results 61 - 80
of 17,461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
The meaningfulness of the appellant's exploitation of the data provided in these abstracts is therefore prima facie questionable. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:36 am
Olson [4] Declaration of G. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 9:00 am
<> Pit River Tribe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
See Kelly v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 4:55 am
Erin G. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 2:21 pm
S. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 2:26 pm
Posted by Dafna G. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
Thomas G. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 4:25 am
Steven G. [read post]
11 May 2011, 3:16 am
Regina (G) v Lambeth London Borough Council and another [2011] EWCA Civ 526; [2011] WLR (D) 152“Accommodation ostensibly provided to a child aged 16 to 17 by a council as a local housing authority was to be deemed to be accommodation provided by it as a children’s services authority where the child met the criteria of a ‘child in need’ within section 17(10) of the Children Act 1989 and the actions of a social worker working for the council in a… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 10:38 am
Visit Stark & Stark's Facebook page during the month of October and "like" us. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:39 pm
The most recent, CM Callow Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:23 am
DEANNA S. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 11:52 am
Proposition G is a school parcel tax initiative that passed on San Francisco’s June 2018 ballot with 60.76% of the vote. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:15 am
Eli Lilly and Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 2:21 pm
S. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:52 am
Robert G. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:11 am
In Avendano v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 1:57 pm
” Segura v. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 1:45 am
This is a particularly interesting one for the IPKat, because it was his announcement of the referral being made back in May 2008 that apparently resulted in an unusual postscript being added to the Court of Appeal's judgment in Actavis v Merck (IPKat commentary here, decision in full here). [read post]
