Search for: "GARNER v. CALIFORNIA" Results 1 - 20 of 449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2016, 8:38 am by Douglas A. Plazak
  A relatively recent case that hasn’t garnered too much attention (Cochran v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:37 am by Mark Schickman, Schickman Law
By its terms, the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) doesn’t require proof of causation or damages as elements of a misappropriation claim. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:58 am by Amy Howe
California Teachers Association, the challenge to the requirement that public employees who decline to join the union that represents them nonetheless pay a fee to cover their share of the costs of collective bargaining, continue to garner coverage. [read post]
  The new law, which goes into effect on January 1, 2020, codified and expands the “ABC” test adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:15 am
At the time, I was posting on the California Court of Appeal's opinion in People v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 2:55 pm
In this month's Costa Mesa, California employment lawyers newsletter, Howard Law attorney Vincent Howard reviewed key California and federal labor and employment law developments from 2011--hot topics that our Riverside, California employment lawyers blog covered over the course last year, including GINA's final regulations, the Supreme Court's ruling in the Walmart v. [read post]