Search for: "GARNER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
REES, ET AL., Respondents. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
§ 2000cc et seq., to require only a minimal showing that a prison grooming rule which concededly imposes a substantial burden on religious exercise is the “least restrictive means of furthering [a] compelling governmental interest. [read post]
