Search for: "GEORGIA PACIFIC CORP" Results 1 - 20 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2014, 9:52 pm
Georgia-Pacific Corp., an appeal from the Supreme Court of Texas, the plaintiff was diagnosed with mesothelioma. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:46 pm by Eric Schweibenz
On April 19, 2010, Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP (“Georgia Pacific”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:06 am
***See alsoOf the appealed Georgia-Pacific case-->Georgia-pacific Corporation, Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 7:47 am
The complaint names US Home Corp., Greystone Nevada LLC, Lennar Nevada, Georgia-Pacific Gypsum LLC and Georgia-Pacific LLC. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 1:07 am by tortsprof
Georgia Pacific Corp., the Texas Supreme Court rejected the "any exposure" or "some exposure" theory of causation, and held that a "substantial factor test" applies to causation in asbestos cases. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 5:56 am by Paul Caron
s transfer of a wholly-owned subsidiary to a joint venture with Georgia Pacific Corp. was a disguised sale under § 707(a)(2)(B), resulting in a $524 million capital gain. [read post]
9 May 2014, 11:13 am by Brian Gross
The Insurance Journal reported on the recent decision: The Court of Appeals ruled that Georgia-Pacific Corp. was not obligated to warn relatives of the dangers of asbestos in the 1960s. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 9:00 am by Suzanne Ilene Schiller
  Just such a “fact-intensive inquiry” was undertaken by the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan last week in Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:11 am by The Docket Navigator
The court understands Plaintiffs’ argument about relevance under Georgia-Pacific factor 12, but both factor 12 and [Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:26 am by The Docket Navigator
"[Defendant] is correct that the [revenue-sharing] agreement cannot be considered under [Georgia-Pacific] factor 12. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:41 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - A patent attorney for GS CleanTech Corporation of Alpharetta, Georgia ("CleanTech") filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the District of Idaho alleging that Pacific Ethanol Magic Valley, LLC of Burley, Idaho ("Pacific"); ICM, Inc. of Colwich, Kansas; and David J. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:08 am by Anthony B. Cavender
Army Corps of Engineers redefining the term “Waters of the United States” in the CWA violated the Act as well as the Administrative Procedure Act; and the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, et al. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 12:10 am
Maybe so, but in this fictional world it is close enough because the starting premise . . . is at least arguably grounded in the evidence and the rule of thumb calculation and the Georgia-Pacific factors are so widely accepted. [read post]
20 May 2013, 12:05 pm by Docket Navigator
The Court has reviewed [the expert's] opinion and his asserted bases for it and concludes he utilizes the proper methodology set forth in Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. [read post]