Search for: "GERING V. STATE" Results 1 - 18 of 18
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2018, 7:41 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Schirer[Affimed; Biles; June 22, 2018]Fourth Amendment violation (improper extension of stop)State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 11:48 am by Dan Flynn
Judge Gering said the basement court room built for the BPI v ABC trial, that ended midway through its fourth week, is a valuable addition to the First Judicial District’s venues. [read post]
17 May 2007, 1:53 am
What is disappointing however, is the towing of a similar line by the police, very much a State appendage. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 1:43 pm by Dan Flynn
A tentative date of June 2017 has been set for the start of the jury trial in a South Dakota state court over the “pink slime” dispute known as BPI v. [read post]
30 May 2015, 4:21 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
”The TGI cited the European Court of Justice (ECJ) Eva Maria Painer. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 3:59 am
One of Malka's Flair photographsA few days ago this blog reported on an interesting decision of the Swedish Supreme Court that held that unauthorized 'appropriation' of a substantial part of a photograph for use in a painting did not amount to copyright infringement, as the meaning of the defendant's work was different from the original work.A few days ago, also a French court (Versailles Court of Appeal) had the opportunity to decide a case (Malka v Klasen, RG… [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 12:40 am by Ben
 In its much awaited judgment in the Delhi University photocopying case (The Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 12:00 pm by Ruth Levush
The state compensates the municipality for the additional costs. 4. [read post]
22 May 2017, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
The trial judge is Cheryle Gering, who has ruled on pre-trial motions and seen her rulings upheld by the South Dakota Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by Ted Tjaden
His claim for such a right ended up in a Supreme Court ruling in his favour in Gideon v Wainwright, 372 US 335 (1963). [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
  A New York federal judge agreed to certify an interlocutory appeal by SiriusXM against the ruling that gave state copyright law protection to pre-1972 sound recordings. [read post]