Search for: "GIST v. GIST" Results 341 - 360 of 1,068
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2016, 7:44 am by Marco Rossi
In case of trust or other similar legal arrangements, “beneficial owner” is defined as follows (article 3, paragraph 6, letter b)): (6) ‘beneficial owner’ means any natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls the customer and/or the natural person(s) on whose behalf a transaction or activity is being conducted and includes at least: … (b) in the case of trusts: (i) the settlor; (ii) the trustee(s); (iii) the protector, if any; (iv) the beneficiaries, or… [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 7:44 am by Marco Rossi
In case of trust or other similar legal arrangements, “beneficial owner” is defined as follows (article 3, paragraph 6, letter b)): (6) ‘beneficial owner’ means any natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls the customer and/or the natural person(s) on whose behalf a transaction or activity is being conducted and includes at least: … (b) in the case of trusts: (i) the settlor; (ii) the trustee(s); (iii) the protector, if any; (iv) the beneficiaries, or… [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 11:47 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
  Here is the gist: In two separate Chapter 13 proceedings, two different “bulk debt buyers” filed proofs of claim, both of which were time-barred. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 11:47 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
  Here is the gist: In two separate Chapter 13 proceedings, two different “bulk debt buyers” filed proofs of claim, both of which were time-barred. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 5:36 am by SHG
That might be coming down the pike, but it’s not the holding of the opinion in Wilson v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 12:39 pm by Michael Grossman
The gist of the company’s supposed wrong-doing is that it allegedly failed to properly test and market talcum. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 5:53 am
The Eastern District of Michigan dismissed the claims in EEOC v. [read post]