Search for: "GIST v. GIST"
Results 361 - 380
of 938
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2015, 4:34 pm
The case of Gulati v MGN Ltd [2015] EWHC 1482 (Ch), to which the attention of this blog’s readers has already been drawn here, is a complex but important case. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Teva Canada Limited v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 5:01 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 3:59 pm
Kelley v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:15 am
In this week’s case (Valuck v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 8:01 am
(quoting United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 1:32 pm
Land v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 2:45 pm
P. 4(a)(1)(B)(ii); Gist v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 1:29 pm
Veteran Medical Products, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:02 am
Tucker v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:11 am
More recent cases from Strasbourg (collected at [76]) receive a fairly emphatic demolition job from Lord Mance over the next 20 paras, but, as we will see, their gist was supported by the dissenting judges. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 11:10 pm
* Chang v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day, Sea Search Armada v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 6:26 am
Moreover, the Dukes v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 7:53 am
PBM Products, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:18 am
The gist of his opinion is that use of new technology doesn’t justify the creation of new legal principles. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:18 pm
The gist of his opinion is that use of new technology doesn’t justify the creation of new legal principles. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:08 am
According to Laws LJ: “[to] be or purport to be a notice of appeal, the document must (a) identify the appellant, (b) identify the decision against which he seeks to appeal and (c) pace Ouseley J in Kaminksi v Judicial Authority of Poland [2010] EWHC 2772, set out at least the gist of the basis on which the appeal is sought to be presented … So much is, I think, inherent in any sensible understanding of a notice of appeal. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:48 am
Power Grp., LLC v. [read post]
