Search for: "GIST v. GIST" Results 361 - 380 of 1,089
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2016, 12:09 pm by Gene Quinn
Bandai Namco Games America and BASCOM Global Internet Services v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 1:16 pm by Giles Peaker
The gist of the appeal is that under CPR 83.2(1)(d), which came into being in 2014, warrants of possession fall within the class of warrants that may require permission to be issued. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:44 pm by Marco Rossi
(b) in the case of trusts:  (i) the settlor;  (ii) the trustee(s);  (iii) the protector, if any;  (iv) the beneficiaries, or where the individuals benefiting from the legal arrangement or entity have yet to be determined, the class of persons in whose main interest the legal arrangement or entity is set up or operates; (v) any other natural person exercising ultimate control over the trust by means of direct or indirect ownership or by other means. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 7:44 am by Marco Rossi
In case of trust or other similar legal arrangements, “beneficial owner” is defined as follows (article 3, paragraph 6, letter b)): (6) ‘beneficial owner’ means any natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls the customer and/or the natural person(s) on whose behalf a transaction or activity is being conducted and includes at least: … (b) in the case of trusts: (i) the settlor; (ii) the trustee(s); (iii) the protector, if any; (iv) the beneficiaries, or… [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 7:44 am by Marco Rossi
In case of trust or other similar legal arrangements, “beneficial owner” is defined as follows (article 3, paragraph 6, letter b)): (6) ‘beneficial owner’ means any natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls the customer and/or the natural person(s) on whose behalf a transaction or activity is being conducted and includes at least: … (b) in the case of trusts: (i) the settlor; (ii) the trustee(s); (iii) the protector, if any; (iv) the beneficiaries, or… [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 11:47 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
  Here is the gist: In two separate Chapter 13 proceedings, two different “bulk debt buyers” filed proofs of claim, both of which were time-barred. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 11:47 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
  Here is the gist: In two separate Chapter 13 proceedings, two different “bulk debt buyers” filed proofs of claim, both of which were time-barred. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 5:36 am by SHG
That might be coming down the pike, but it’s not the holding of the opinion in Wilson v. [read post]