Search for: "GIST v. GIST"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,089
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2016, 1:16 pm
The gist of the appeal is that under CPR 83.2(1)(d), which came into being in 2014, warrants of possession fall within the class of warrants that may require permission to be issued. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 8:29 am
Fuentes Colleyville, L.P. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 8:29 am
Fuentes Colleyville, L.P. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 8:29 am
Fuentes Colleyville, L.P. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:44 pm
(b) in the case of trusts: (i) the settlor; (ii) the trustee(s); (iii) the protector, if any; (iv) the beneficiaries, or where the individuals benefiting from the legal arrangement or entity have yet to be determined, the class of persons in whose main interest the legal arrangement or entity is set up or operates; (v) any other natural person exercising ultimate control over the trust by means of direct or indirect ownership or by other means. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 7:44 am
In case of trust or other similar legal arrangements, “beneficial owner” is defined as follows (article 3, paragraph 6, letter b)): (6) ‘beneficial owner’ means any natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls the customer and/or the natural person(s) on whose behalf a transaction or activity is being conducted and includes at least: … (b) in the case of trusts: (i) the settlor; (ii) the trustee(s); (iii) the protector, if any; (iv) the beneficiaries, or… [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 7:44 am
In case of trust or other similar legal arrangements, “beneficial owner” is defined as follows (article 3, paragraph 6, letter b)): (6) ‘beneficial owner’ means any natural person(s) who ultimately owns or controls the customer and/or the natural person(s) on whose behalf a transaction or activity is being conducted and includes at least: … (b) in the case of trusts: (i) the settlor; (ii) the trustee(s); (iii) the protector, if any; (iv) the beneficiaries, or… [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 11:47 pm
Here is the gist: In two separate Chapter 13 proceedings, two different “bulk debt buyers” filed proofs of claim, both of which were time-barred. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 11:47 pm
Here is the gist: In two separate Chapter 13 proceedings, two different “bulk debt buyers” filed proofs of claim, both of which were time-barred. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 10:52 am
by Dennis Crouch McRO v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:17 pm
Bay Area Clean Environment, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 11:07 am
Kuligoski v. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 5:36 am
That might be coming down the pike, but it’s not the holding of the opinion in Wilson v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 11:19 am
In Alexander v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 5:36 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 12:39 pm
The gist of the company’s supposed wrong-doing is that it allegedly failed to properly test and market talcum. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Teva Canada Limited v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 5:53 am
The Eastern District of Michigan dismissed the claims in EEOC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 11:25 am
Bay Area Citizens v. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 6:43 am
U.S. v. [read post]
