Search for: "GIST v. GIST" Results 101 - 120 of 946
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2023, 11:41 am by Kevin LaCroix
The gist of the complaint is that as the pandemic, Danaher failed to disclose that as the pandemic evolved, the company’s pandemic-related revenue growth was declining and that the company overstated its ability to continue the growth the company had experienced in 2020 and 2021. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 6:06 pm
  Chapter V Legal Responsibilities; Articles 53-69Provisions sketching out penalties are included (Articles 53-55; 60-65). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:36 am by Daniel Schwartz
No, not the affirmative action one (we’ll get to that in another post) but the one on religious accommodation, Groff v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:55 am by Daniel Carpenter-Gold
Yesterday, the UCLA Environmental Law Clinic filed a brief in the California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 10:53 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a March 27, 2023 post found here, we wrote about the Second District Court of Appeal’s (Div. 1) decision concerning the Water Code section 13389 CEQA exemption for Regional Water Quality Control Board (“RWQCB”) issuance of waste discharge permits, formerly published as Los Angeles Waterkeeper v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:21 am by LII Team
;  International Code Council, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
For example, a few journalists completely blew NFIB v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 3:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
This is Nunes' latest libel lawsuit, just filed yesterday in Florida state court; I'm too slammed to write about it in detail, but I thought I'd pass along the Complaint (Nunes v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 2:01 pm by Edward T. Kang
In January 2022, the gist of the action doctrine was again put to the test in SodexoMAGIC v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 1:59 pm by Edward T. Kang
In January 2022, the gist of the action doctrine was again put to the test in SodexoMAGIC v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 3:03 pm by Larry
United States (President Bident and a bunch of other named officials are also defendants).The gist of the decision is simple enough. [read post]