Search for: "GOODWIN v. STATE" Results 281 - 300 of 451
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2022, 5:52 am by Laurence H. Tribe
Now is “no ordinary time,” to borrow the title of Doris Kearns Goodwin’s Pulitzer Prize-winning chronicle of Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am by Graeme Hall
Goodwin v NGN Ltd [2011] EWHC 1437 (QB) (09 June 2011): Identity of Fred Goodwin’s alleged mistress to remain secret but her occupation to be revealed. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 12:16 am by INFORRM
– Judith Townend Case Law: CTB v News Group Newspapers: privacy law and the judiciary – Edward Craven Privacy law: the super-injunction is dead Case Law: Mosley v United Kingdom: pre-notification rejected by Strasbourg – Hugh Tomlinson QC Case Law: Goodwin v NGN – Privacy, Intrusion and Novelty – Mark Thomson Case Law: Thornton v Telegraph Media Group, an offer of amends defence fails – Hugh Tomlinson QC Finally, we… [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 3:43 am by INFORRM
But Mr Johnson said his colleague had “made an assumption” and that he had not stated his information came from police. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am by Schachtman
Schepers, “The Biological Action of Talc and Other Silicate Minerals,” in Goodwin, Proceedings on the Symposium on Talc; U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 6:56 am
United States, 60 M.J. 446 (C.A.A.F. 2005) (remanding to NMCCA with guidance about panel membership) (capital case) [Categories 2, 4]Goodwin v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am by INFORRM
   In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales  [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
  The proposals were aimed at curbing “radical environmental groups who make a hobby of spreading misinformation to markets with the aim of destroying Tasmanian jobs”, the state attorney general, Vanessa Goodwin, said at the time. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:50 pm by INFORRM
In the Courts On 9 June 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat handed down a complex and interesting judgment in the case of Goodwin v News Group Newspapers (No.3) ([2011] EWHC 1437 (QB)), refusing an application to permit the identification of the interested party – but perhaps surprisingly allowing the identification of her job description. [read post]