Search for: "GOODWIN v. STATE" Results 361 - 380 of 452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2021, 6:08 am
Robert Brown, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, on Friday, March 12, 2021 Tags: Accountability, Accounting, Accounting standards, Audits, Bebchuk v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
Justice Goodwin Liu filed a twenty-one-page dissent from the eighty-three-page majority opinion. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
As far as sources are concerned, both UK and Strasbourg cases have recognised the important function served by journalists’ ability to protect their sources (Goodwin v UK, Mersey Care NHS Trust v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:02 am
Of particular interest to Episcopalians is the current case in Massachusetts of Gill v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:44 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
” Resolution 1165 was quoted by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the 1994 Von Hannover v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am by Andrew Hamm
” Julie Rovner of Governing reports that many states are poised to ban abortion, if Roe v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm by INFORRM
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking Group… [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
The trial court held the class action was barred because Iskanian had signed an arbitration agreement waiving any participation in a “class action” or “representative action,” but the California Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Goodwin Liu, held that because PAGA allowed an individual to act as a “proxy” for the state, the Federal Arbitration Act’s “goal of promoting arbitration as a means of private dispute resolution does not… [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:40 pm by John A. Emmons
ET: The Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society hosted a live event to analyze oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Gonzales v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 5:21 pm by Joe Mullin
Schreiner said the Court had “launched the United States Patent System into the Information Age with the Bilski v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 7:38 am by Beth Graham
Goodwin, 924 S.W.2d 943, 944 (Tex. 1996) (per curiam) (“Federal and state law strongly favor arbitration. . . . [read post]